Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Marwave Shipmanagement Srlyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Marwave Shipmanagement Srl | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 6 |
| CO₂ emitted | 47 kt−10.4% |
| Fuel per mile | 111 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 10.2 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 9.1% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Oil tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0
- Marwave Shipmanagement Srl8.9 (+12% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marwave Shipmanagement Srl | 2 | 8.9 | +12% | 142 | 9.9 | 2,701 | 8.7% | – |
| Segment median | 8.0 | 0% |
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0
- Marwave Shipmanagement Srl13.1 (−13% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marwave Shipmanagement Srl | 4 | 13.1 | −13% | 85 | 10.4 | 3,081 | 9.6% | – |
| Segment median | 15.0 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marwave Shipmanagement Srl | ABS (6) | 100% | 17% | 0% | 0% |
Marwave Shipmanagement Srl: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEONIA | 9313436 | Chemical tanker | 17.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | +15% | 11.2 | 7,733 t | €309k |
| EGRET | 9747120 | Chemical tanker | 8.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | +7% | 9.9 | 9,404 t | €61k |
| GHIBLI | 9417799 | Oil tanker | 8.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.2 | −3% | 9.8 | 22,112 t | €645k |
| LIA | 9417751 | Oil tanker | 9.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.4 | −5% | 10.8 | 1,961 t | €55k |
30 of 6 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.