Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC LEANDRA V

IMO: 9313943
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 28,550 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.14 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SEAGO ISTANBUL

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 28,263 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

187

Container median 182 kg/nm (+3%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

20.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+2%)

Average speed

15.3 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+11%)

Fuel per day at sea

69.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,216 t

CO₂ emitted

47,523 t

Distance sailed

81,190 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,292 h

221 days, 60% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 237 kg/nm · median 177 (+34%)

78.8Ranks 1,550 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.9 kn · median 13.3 (+5%)

9.1Faster than 59% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 26.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+60%)

7.22Ranks 1,590 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports50%
From the EU2%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

15,216 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,003 t

2.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC LEANDRA V
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC LEANDRA V
Container median

13.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC LEANDRA V
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	+9%	+7%	−16%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.6 kn	+25%	+31%	+52%	+0%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2023	+0.5 kn	−12%	−8%	+80%	−20%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	+1%	−6%	−66%	+73%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	+1%	+1%	−3%	−59%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	−1.2 kn	+3%	−6%	+0%	+117%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	14,636	45,925	61,657	4,420	13.9	237	26.1	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	15,990	50,024	73,283	5,166	14.2	218	25.4	–
2023	not published	8,405	26,508	48,306	3,547	13.6	174	25.3	–
2021	not published	5,278	16,450	26,814	2,053	13.1	197	31.7	–
2020	not published	15,361	46,178	78,573	5,606	14.0	196	18.4	100%
2019	not published	15,676	48,885	81,300	5,780	14.1	193	45.0	100%
2018	not published	15,216	47,523	81,190	5,292	15.3	187	20.7	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	26.1	16.3	+60%	1,590 of 2,208	DNV	C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	25.4	17.5	+45%	1,340 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023	not published	25.3	19.4	+31%	1,198 of 1,899	DNV	C
2021	not published	31.7	17.9	+77%	1,343 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	18.4	17.6	+5%	942 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	45.0	18.9	+138%	1,488 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	20.7	20.2	+2%	876 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.