Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC BREMERHAVEN V

IMO: 9313967
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 21,869 t
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.21 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SEAGO BREMERHAVEN, MSC BREMERHAVEN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 21,869 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

215.5 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+22%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

30.76

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+89%)

Average speed

12.5 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

64.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,130 t

CO₂ emitted

28,495 t

28,944 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

42,360 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,384 h

141 days, 39% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 215.5 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+22%)

78.8Ranks 1,380 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 12.5 kn · median 13.3 (−6%)

9.1Faster than 38% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 30.76 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+89%)

7.22Ranks 1,702 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports18%
From the EU46%
Into the EU33%
At berth in the EU3%

60% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (17,208 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.5 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MSC BREMERHAVEN V
Container median

140.0160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC BREMERHAVEN V
Container median

12.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC BREMERHAVEN V
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.6 kn	−5%	−15%	+267%	+21%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.1 kn	+42%	+66%	−53%	−1%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 42%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−1.2 kn	−24%	−31%	+128%	−11%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	+7%	+12%	+0%	+43%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−1.5 kn	+4%	−7%	−87%	+18%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	+6%	+4%	−2%	−53%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	−8%	−10%	−4%	−32%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	9,130	28,495	42,360	3,384	12.5	215.5	30.76	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	2,609	8,132	11,527	817	14.1	226.4	25.49	–
2023	not published	3,871	12,218	24,276	2,016	12.0	159.5	25.68	–
2022	not published	2,235	7,054	10,657	807	13.2	209.7	28.94	–
2021	not published	2,079	6,474	10,604	838	12.7	196.0	20.22	–
2020LNG	not published	15,120	44,350	80,062	5,649	14.2	188.8	17.20	100%
2019	not published	14,600	45,509	81,832	5,690	14.4	178.4	36.35	100%
2018	not published	16,418	51,289	84,882	5,731	14.8	193.4	53.84	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	30.76	16.30	+89%	1,702 of 2,208	DNV	C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	25.49	17.52	+45%	1,342 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023	not published	25.68	19.40	+32%	1,212 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	28.94	19.13	+51%	1,274 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	20.22	17.90	+13%	1,006 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020LNG	not published	17.20	17.58	−2%	866 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	36.35	18.88	+93%	1,364 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	53.84	20.22	+166%	1,533 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.