Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC BREMERHAVEN V

IMO: 9313967
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 21,869 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.21 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SEAGO BREMERHAVEN, MSC BREMERHAVEN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 11,223 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

193

Container median 182 kg/nm (+6%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

53.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+166%)

Average speed

14.8 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+7%)

Fuel per day at sea

68.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,418 t

CO₂ emitted

51,289 t

Distance sailed

84,882 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,731 h

239 days, 65% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 216 kg/nm · median 177 (+22%)

78.8Ranks 1,380 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.5 kn · median 13.3 (−6%)

9.1Faster than 38% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 30.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+89%)

7.22Ranks 1,702 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports44%
From the EU12%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

16,418 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,139 t

2.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC BREMERHAVEN V
Container median

140.0160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC BREMERHAVEN V
Container median

12.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC BREMERHAVEN V
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.6 kn	−5%	−15%	+267%	+21%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.1 kn	+42%	+66%	−53%	−1%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 42%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−1.2 kn	−24%	−31%	+128%	−11%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	+7%	+12%	+0%	+43%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−1.5 kn	+4%	−7%	−87%	+18%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	+6%	+4%	−2%	−53%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	−8%	−10%	−4%	−32%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	9,130	28,495	42,360	3,384	12.5	216	30.8	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	2,609	8,132	11,527	817	14.1	226	25.5	–
2023	not published	3,871	12,218	24,276	2,016	12.0	160	25.7	–
2022	not published	2,235	7,054	10,657	807	13.2	210	28.9	–
2021	not published	2,079	6,474	10,604	838	12.7	196	20.2	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	15,120	44,350	80,062	5,649	14.2	189	17.2	100%
2019	not published	14,600	45,509	81,832	5,690	14.4	178	36.4	100%
2018	not published	16,418	51,289	84,882	5,731	14.8	193	53.8	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	30.8	16.3	+89%	1,702 of 2,208	DNV	C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	25.5	17.5	+45%	1,342 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023	not published	25.7	19.4	+32%	1,212 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	28.9	19.1	+51%	1,274 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	20.2	17.9	+13%	1,006 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	17.2	17.6	−2%	866 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	36.4	18.9	+93%	1,364 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	53.8	20.2	+166%	1,533 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.