Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

CHELSEA-2

IMO: 9314442
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 3,337 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 15.69 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Black Sea Shipping Management

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,337 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

19.3 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (−45%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

17.31

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (−32%)

Average speed

6.3 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (−32%)

Fuel per day at sea

2.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

376 t

CO₂ emitted

1,204 t

1,222 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

19,502 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,073 h

128 days, 35% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 19.3 kg/nm · median 35.3 (−45%)

17.4Ranks 365 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 6.3 kn · median 9.3 (−32%)

7.0Faster than 6% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 17.31 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (−32%)

10.14Ranks 587 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports9%
From the EU43%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU4%

56% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (679 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CHELSEA-2
General cargo median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CHELSEA-2
General cargo median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

CHELSEA-2
General cargo median

10.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.1 kn	−8%	−22%	+120%	–	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.3 kn	−20%	−3%	−14%	–	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	−6%	−14%	+87%	+46%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+10%	+5%	+9%	+2%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	−10%	−5%	−41%	−48%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.1 kn	+6%	+57%	+96%	+55%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	−8%	−7%	−25%	−15%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Black Sea Shipping Management	376	1,204	19,502	3,073	6.3	19.3	18.50	–
2024	Black Sea Shipping Management	186	595	8,869	1,195	7.4	20.9	16.65	–
2023	not published	270	867	10,371	1,687	6.1	26.1	–	–
2022	not published	153	491	5,532	845	6.6	27.7	22.83	–
2021	not published	128	409	5,078	737	6.9	25.1	20.82	–
2020	not published	242	776	8,676	1,313	6.6	27.9	40.36	57%
2019	not published	116	372	4,428	981	4.5	26.2	26.68	–
2018	not published	168	537	5,903	1,330	4.4	28.4	–	39%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Black Sea Shipping Management	17.31	25.45	−32%	587 of 2,706	Verifavia	A
2024	Black Sea Shipping Management	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	29.65	20.67	+43%	816 of 1,045	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	20.24	21.57	−6%	456 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	19.89	22.70	−12%	433 of 1,142	Verifavia	B
2020	not published	38.09	24.50	+55%	952 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	24.59	24.96	−1%	562 of 1,154	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	29.09	24.89	+17%	649 of 1,044	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.