Navalyze · Container · Ship

WEC VAN RIJN

IMO: 9315006
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 7,795 t
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 21.76 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: ELAN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,349 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

85.0

Container median 174 kg/nm (−51%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

36.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+93%)

Average speed

13.4 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

27.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,551 t

CO₂ emitted

17,504 t

Distance sailed

65,289 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,864 h

203 days, 56% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 84.3 kg/nm · median 177 (−52%)

78.8Ranks 316 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 13.3 (−16%)

9.1Faster than 24% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 33.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+107%)

7.22Ranks 1,760 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports92%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,407 t

8.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

WEC VAN RIJN
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

WEC VAN RIJN
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

WEC VAN RIJN
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	−11%	−13%	−20%	−18%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+12%	+8%	−1%	+5%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	−3%	−7%	+10%	+2%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+6%	+2%	−13%	+11%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.3 kn	+2%	+14%	+7%	−7%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.7 kn	−5%	−18%	−14%	+2%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	−3%	−2%	+14%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	3,803	11,875	45,083	4,021	11.2	84.3	33.8	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	5,327	16,703	56,465	4,890	11.5	94.3	41.0	–
2023	not published	4,787	14,627	57,010	4,753	12.0	84.0	39.0	–
2022	not published	4,506	14,319	51,861	4,148	12.5	86.9	38.2	–
2021	not published	4,926	15,584	59,900	4,598	13.0	82.2	34.5	–
2020	not published	4,539	14,320	56,156	4,811	11.7	80.8	37.1	–
2019	not published	5,551	17,504	65,289	4,864	13.4	85.0	36.5	–
2018	not published	4,974	15,692	57,034	4,285	13.3	87.2	37.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	33.8	16.3	+107%	1,760 of 2,208	DNV	C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	41.0	17.5	+134%	1,632 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023	not published	39.0	19.4	+101%	1,527 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	38.2	19.1	+100%	1,455 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	34.5	17.9	+93%	1,400 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	37.1	17.6	+111%	1,438 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	36.5	18.9	+93%	1,368 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	37.6	20.2	+86%	1,304 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.