Navalyze · Container · Ship

WEC DE HOOGH

IMO: 9315018
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 8,107 t
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 21.85 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: ELITE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,107 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

83.3 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−53%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

32.10

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+97%)

Average speed

12.7 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,141 t

CO₂ emitted

16,070 t

16,322 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

61,751 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,878 h

203 days, 56% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 83.3 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−53%)

78.8Ranks 296 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 12.7 kn · median 13.3 (−5%)

9.1Faster than 40% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 32.10 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+97%)

7.22Ranks 1,727 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports87%
From the EU5%
Into the EU1%
At berth in the EU7%

97% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (15,619 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

6.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

WEC DE HOOGH
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

WEC DE HOOGH
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

WEC DE HOOGH
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	+6%	+8%	−4%	−3%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	−7%	−5%	+39%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	+2%	+2%	−20%	+12%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	+1%	−7%	−4%	+2%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	−5%	−0%	+3%	−8%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	−3%	−7%	−9%	−1%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+1.3 kn	−5%	+5%	+18%	−1%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	5,141	16,070	61,751	4,878	12.7	83.3	32.10	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	5,087	15,893	64,458	5,226	12.3	78.9	33.04	–
2023	not published	3,905	11,785	46,266	3,796	12.2	84.4	40.33	–
2022	not published	4,745	15,069	57,505	4,700	12.2	82.5	36.12	–
2021	not published	4,903	15,510	59,839	4,502	13.3	81.9	35.51	–
2020	not published	5,022	15,872	58,085	4,592	12.6	86.5	38.69	–
2019	not published	5,670	17,892	63,709	4,847	13.1	89.0	39.16	–
2018	not published	5,093	16,077	54,182	4,582	11.8	94.0	39.54	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	32.10	16.30	+97%	1,727 of 2,208	DNV	C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	33.04	17.52	+89%	1,516 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023	not published	40.33	19.40	+108%	1,542 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	36.12	19.13	+89%	1,418 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	35.51	17.90	+98%	1,418 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	38.69	17.58	+120%	1,463 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	39.16	18.88	+107%	1,407 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	39.54	20.22	+96%	1,340 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.