Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

0183 MAERSK SEBAROK

IMO
9315238
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
57,861 t
Flag (estimated)
Singapore
Port of registry
Singapore
Technical efficiency
EIV 14.89 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
MAERSK SEBAROK
?

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 61,804 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
236
Container median 186 kg/nm (+27%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
11.9
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−34%)
Average speed
16.4 kn
Container median 14.1 kn (+16%)
Fuel per day at sea
92.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
9,612 t
CO₂ emitted
29,970 t
Distance sailed
40,783 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,483 h
103 days, 28% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2022

Set against all 1,825 container ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 221 kg/nm · median 178 (+24%)
77.9Ranks 1,128 of 1,825, lowest first314
Average speedThis ship 14.1 kn · median 13.6 (+4%)
10.1Faster than 60% of container ships16.1
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.1 (−38%)
7.44Ranks 476 of 1,825, lowest first52.6
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports4%
  • From the EU47%
  • Into the EU47%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
459 t
1.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • 0183 MAERSK SEBAROK
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • 0183 MAERSK SEBAROK
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • 0183 MAERSK SEBAROK
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2021→2022−2.3 kn−6%−19%−94%+0%2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+2.5 kn+13%+33%+21%+5%2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+0.6 kn−6%−2%+18%−0%0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−0.6 kn−1%−5%−9%+5%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2022not published5621,7522,54418014.122111.9–
2021not published9,61229,97040,7832,48316.423611.9–
2020not published7,02721,93733,6392,42313.920911.4–
2019not published6,30519,66328,4352,13513.322211.4–
2018not published6,97621,73231,1202,23313.922410.8–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2022not published11.919.1−38%476 of 1,825DNVB
2021not published11.917.9−34%465 of 1,781VerifaviaB
2020not published11.417.6−35%464 of 1,797VerifaviaB
2019not published11.418.9−40%418 of 1,788VerifaviaB
2018not published10.820.2−47%312 of 1,705VerifaviaB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.