Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

BOSTON

IMO
9315355
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
13,081 t
Port of registry
Majuro
Technical efficiency
EEXI 15.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
CELSIUS BOSTON

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: BLFVI Container 1 Ltd

?
?

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 13,081 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
141.1 kg/nm
Container median 167.2 kg/nm (−16%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
33.60
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.52 (+92%)
Average speed
12.6 kn
Container median 13.5 kn (−7%)
Fuel per day at sea
42.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
6,022 t
CO₂ emitted
18,758 t
19,054 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
42,679 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,378 h
141 days, 39% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 141.1 kg/nm · median 167.2 (−16%)
78.9Ranks 809 of 1,974, lowest first301.6
Average speedThis ship 12.6 kn · median 13.5 (−7%)
9.6Faster than 35% of container ships16.1
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 33.60 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.52 (+92%)
7.33Ranks 1,528 of 1,974, lowest first51.62
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports1%
  • From the EU43%
  • Into the EU56%
  • At berth in the EU0%

30% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,561 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
0.4%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.3 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • BOSTON
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • BOSTON
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • BOSTON
  • Container median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2023→2024−0.2 kn−2%−3%+105%+97%Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2024part-yearBLFVI Container 1 Ltd2,4737,70317,9971,26914.2137.4––
2024CONBULK SHIPMANAGEMENT CORPORATION6,02218,75842,6793,37812.6141.133.60–
2023not published2,9939,43720,7761,62412.8144.117.04–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2024part-yearBLFVI Container 1 Ltd––––ClassNKC
2024CONBULK SHIPMANAGEMENT CORPORATION33.6017.52+92%1,528 of 1,974ABSA
2023not published17.0419.40−12%828 of 1,899ClassNKC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.