Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- CONBULK SHIPMANAGEMENT CORPORATIONyour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| CONBULK SHIPMANAGEMENT CORPORATION | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 25 |
| CO₂ emitted | 289 kt |
| Fuel per mile | 137 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 11.5 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 3.5% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 17.5
- CONBULK SHIPMANAGEMENT CORPORATION23.4 (+34% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONBULK SHIPMANAGEMENT CORPORATION | 23 | 23.4 | +34% | 137 | 11.5 | 2,290 | 3.4% | – |
| Segment median | 17.5 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- CONBULK SHIPMANAGEMENT CORPORATION5.9 (−27% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONBULK SHIPMANAGEMENT CORPORATION | 2 | 5.9 | −27% | 93 | 10.0 | 325 | 6.1% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONBULK SHIPMANAGEMENT CORPORATION | ABS (25) | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
CONBULK SHIPMANAGEMENT CORPORATION: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SC PHILLY | 9330276 | Container | 119 g CO₂/t·nm | 47.2 | +152% | 8.0 | 2,235 t | €29k |
| SC PHOENIX | 9236262 | Container | 95.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 47.2 | +102% | 7.5 | 1,410 t | €29k |
| GARWOOD | 9347255 | Container | 40.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +86% | 8.2 | 4,061 t | €91k |
| BOSTON | 9315355 | Container | 33.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +54% | 12.6 | 18,758 t | €167k |
| MAYFIELD | 9216353 | Container | 62.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 47.2 | +32% | 10.8 | 7,981 t | €130k |
| BELITAKI | 9152923 | Container | 27.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +25% | 9.4 | 8,781 t | €47k |
| ALGECIRAS EXPRESS | 9227015 | Container | 18.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.5 | +25% | 12.4 | 7,415 t | €112k |
| SC MADISON | 9593361 | Bulk carrier | 5.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.9 | +21% | 10.0 | 946 t | €14k |
| SC MONTREUX | 9295414 | Container | 25.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +15% | 13.9 | 25,081 t | €434k |
| HALSTED | 9337262 | Container | 24.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +12% | 15.0 | 3,048 t | €47k |
| SC POTOMAC | 9236274 | Container | 51.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 47.2 | +10% | 9.4 | 5,242 t | €90k |
| CUSSLER | 9314997 | Container | 23.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +7% | 12.9 | 15,100 t | €244k |
| SC HOUSTON | 9445904 | Container | 23.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +7% | 11.7 | 23,892 t | €510k |
| GARDINER | 9275048 | Container | 23.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | +7% | 15.3 | 18,551 t | €313k |
| MIRADOR EXPRESS | 9243174 | Container | 21.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | 0% | 16.1 | 5,155 t | €82k |
| SC MEDFORD | 9275103 | Container | 46.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 47.2 | −1% | 10.4 | 10,139 t | €161k |
| HALLEY | 9275062 | Container | 21.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | −3% | 13.6 | 8,405 t | €135k |
| OOCL ST. LAWRENCE | 9290414 | Container | 20.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | −5% | 11.5 | 24,533 t | €464k |
| PORTSMOUTH | 9302437 | Container | 19.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | −13% | 12.3 | 1,708 t | €26k |
| LASALLE | 9349368 | Container | 19.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | −13% | 9.3 | 16,257 t | €248k |
| HUTTON | 9311787 | Container | 18.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | −13% | 13.4 | 15,509 t | €272k |
| SC MONTREAL | 9311830 | Container | 16.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | −25% | 9.6 | 13,531 t | €209k |
30 of 27 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.