Navalyze · Container · Ship

SASKIA A

IMO: 9315927
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 21,558 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Izmir
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.61 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Arkas Konteyner Tasimacilik A.S. · part of Arkas

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 16,796 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

140

Container median 165 kg/nm (−15%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

26.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (+34%)

Average speed

11.3 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

38.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,639 t

CO₂ emitted

14,501 t

Distance sailed

33,232 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,929 h

122 days, 33% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 141 kg/nm · median 177 (−20%)

78.8Ranks 852 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.1 kn · median 13.3 (−17%)

9.1Faster than 23% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+25%)

7.22Ranks 1,362 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports28%
From the EU41%
Into the EU24%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,124 t

7.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SASKIA A
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SASKIA A
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SASKIA A
Container median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	+4%	+3%	−74%	−19%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	−3%	−4%	−13%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	+3%	−0%	+56%	+5%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2022	+2.2 kn	+59%	+94%	+1,185%	+112%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 59%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2020	+1.9 kn	−30%	−12%	−54%	−15%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 30%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Arkas Konteyner Tasimacilik A.S.	1,076	3,357	7,645	687	11.1	141	20.4	–
2024	Arkas Konteyner Tasimacilik A.S.	3,916	12,237	29,032	2,575	11.3	135	25.2	–
2023	not published	4,639	14,501	33,232	2,929	11.3	140	26.0	–
2022	not published	2,889	9,040	21,243	1,821	11.7	136	24.6	–
2020	not published	141	442	1,653	173	9.5	85.4	11.6	–
2018	not published	435	1,358	3,555	470	7.6	122	13.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Arkas Konteyner Tasimacilik A.S.	20.4	16.3	+25%	1,362 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	Arkas Konteyner Tasimacilik A.S.	25.2	17.5	+44%	1,332 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	26.0	19.4	+34%	1,221 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	24.6	19.1	+29%	1,133 of 1,825	DNV	A
2020	not published	11.6	17.6	−34%	483 of 1,797	DNV	A
2018	not published	13.7	20.2	−32%	474 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.