Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC HANNAH

IMO: 9316347
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 19,256 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.89 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 19,256 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

140.1 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−21%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

22.74

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+40%)

Average speed

8.7 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−35%)

Fuel per day at sea

29.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,146 t

CO₂ emitted

19,215 t

19,517 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

43,882 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,028 h

210 days, 57% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 140.1 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−21%)

78.8Ranks 850 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 8.7 kn · median 13.3 (−35%)

9.1Faster than 8% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 22.74 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+40%)

7.22Ranks 1,468 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports44%
From the EU17%
Into the EU28%
At berth in the EU10%

77% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (14,829 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

10.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MSC HANNAH
Container median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC HANNAH
Container median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC HANNAH
Container median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	+6%	+13%	+2%	+9%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−2.7 kn	−8%	−31%	+104%	−6%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2023	−0.6 kn	+2%	−4%	−11%	−20%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	−1%	+0%	−63%	−15%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.4 kn	−7%	+7%	+82%	+35%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	6,146	19,215	43,882	5,028	8.7	140.1	22.74	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	5,679	17,730	42,827	5,236	8.2	132.6	20.95	–
2023	not published	3,035	9,464	21,015	1,932	10.9	144.4	22.36	–
2020	not published	3,360	10,511	23,705	2,060	11.5	141.7	28.08	–
2019	not published	9,328	29,267	64,889	5,730	11.3	143.8	32.94	–
2018	not published	5,537	17,293	35,737	3,616	9.9	154.9	24.41	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	22.74	16.30	+40%	1,468 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	20.95	17.52	+20%	1,180 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	22.36	19.40	+15%	1,101 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	28.08	17.58	+60%	1,296 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	32.94	18.88	+74%	1,320 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	24.41	20.22	+21%	1,025 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.