Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

DOBROTA

IMO: 9317779
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 17,409 t
Flag (estimated): Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Port of registry: Kingstown
Technical efficiency: EIV 7.10 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Dabinovic Monaco S.A.M.

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 17,409 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

64.8

Bulk carrier median 86.1 kg/nm (−25%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.27 (+42%)

Average speed

10.3 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.8 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,013 t

CO₂ emitted

6,351 t

Distance sailed

31,046 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,024 h

126 days, 35% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 3,548 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 64.8 kg/nm · median 86.1 (−25%)

63.6Ranks 426 of 3,548, lowest first125

Average speedThis ship 10.3 kn · median 10.8 (−5%)

8.8Faster than 32% of bulk carrier ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.27 (+42%)

4.85Ranks 2,725 of 3,548, lowest first17.4

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports17%
From the EU41%
Into the EU37%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

1,103 t

55% of all fuel; 45% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

326 t

5.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

DOBROTA
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

DOBROTA
Bulk carrier median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

DOBROTA
Bulk carrier median

0.05.010.015.0

’192019’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−3%	−3%	+86%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.9 kn	+6%	−3%	−45%	+13%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+0%	−2%	−21%	–	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.9 kn	−9%	+20%	+19%	–	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	–	−2%	–	+54%	–

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024part-year	Dabinovic Monaco S.A.M.	371	1,170	4,764	930	5.1	77.8	12.2	69%
2023	not published	2,013	6,351	31,046	3,024	10.3	64.8	11.8	55%
2022	not published	1,118	3,531	16,716	1,626	10.3	66.9	12.9	59%
2021	not published	1,914	6,063	30,287	2,700	11.2	63.2	11.4	59%
2020	not published	2,424	7,686	38,435	3,354	11.5	63.1	1.13	63%
2019	not published	2,256	7,059	32,347	3,762	8.6	69.7	0.98	–
2018	not published	1,489	4,659	20,968	0	–	71.0	31,718	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024part-year	Dabinovic Monaco S.A.M.	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	11.8	8.27	+42%	2,725 of 3,548	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	12.9	8.71	+48%	3,151 of 3,968	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	11.4	8.57	+33%	2,641 of 3,466	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	0.98	8.38	−88%	7 of 3,360	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	EUROCERT S.A	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.