Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

AMUR RIVER

IMO
9317999
Type
LNG carrier
Flag (estimated)
Marshall Islands
Port of registry
Majuro
Technical efficiency
EEXI 7.28 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IA
Fuel (estimated)
Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Dynagas Ltd

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
458
LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (+98%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
13.6
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (+50%)
Average speed
6.5 kn
LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (−54%)
Fuel per day at sea
71.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
21,340 t
CO₂ emitted
61,334 t
Distance sailed
46,630 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
7,183 h
299 days, 82% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 318 kg/nm · median 190 (+67%)
152Ranks 346 of 386, lowest first319
Average speedThis ship 14.6 kn · median 14.4 (+1%)
11.2Faster than 54% of LNG carrier ships15.9
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 9.79 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+37%)
5.06Ranks 285 of 386, lowest first16.1
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports20%
  • From the EU41%
  • Into the EU38%
  • At berth in the EU1%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
853 t
1.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • AMUR RIVER
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • AMUR RIVER
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • AMUR RIVER
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+7.2 kn−35%+28%+1%−75%7.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 35%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024+0.9 kn+6%+22%−65%+192%0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−1.9 kn+44%+11%+101%−10%1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 44%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025LNGDynagas Ltd5,15614,32216,2241,11114.6318––
2024LNGDynagas Ltd7,84921,71016,1072,1657.4487––
2023LNG / alt.not published21,34061,33446,6307,1836.5458––
2022LNG / alt.not published7,37621,49923,2562,7608.4317––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025LNGDynagas Ltd9.797.12+37%285 of 386EMICERTA+C
2024LNGDynagas Ltd39.77.39+438%301 of 312EMICERTA+C
2023LNG / alt.not published13.69.10+50%297 of 355EMICERTA+C
2022LNG / alt.not published15.210.4+47%299 of 379EMICERTA+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.