Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

DOVER SEAWAYS

IMO
9318345
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
United Kingdom
Port of registry
Dover
Technical efficiency
EEXI 24.59 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DFDS A/S · part of DFDS

?
?

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
179
Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (+16%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
33.4
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 815 (−96%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
5.00
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 226 (−98%)
Average speed
15.3 kn
Ro-pax median 16.2 kn (−6%)
Fuel per day at sea
65.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
16,294 t
CO₂ emitted
50,742 t
Distance sailed
90,900 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,937 h
247 days, 68% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 178 kg/nm · median 150 (+19%)
69.3Ranks 284 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 15.4 kn · median 15.8 (−3%)
12.0Faster than 44% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,691 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+199%)
66.8Ranks 376 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 92.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−64%)
48.6Ranks 83 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU49%
  • Into the EU46%
  • At berth in the EU5%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
2,522 t
5.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • DOVER SEAWAYS
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • DOVER SEAWAYS
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • DOVER SEAWAYS
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • DOVER SEAWAYS
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.2 kn−3%−4%−1%+3%Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024+0.1 kn−2%−1%−7%+131%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023−2.1 kn+8%−5%−3%−13%2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+2.3 kn−4%+10%−6%+2,362%2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−0.6 kn−8%−11%+2%−97%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020−0.3 kn−9%−11%−7%+88%Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+0.0 kn+8%+8%−0%−68%Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025DFDS A/S13,66042,57776,6914,97815.4178––
2024DFDS A/S14,21044,78277,7984,98915.6183––
2023not published15,52248,34483,5195,39215.5186––
2022not published14,72145,85185,8884,88017.6171––
2021not published16,29450,74290,9005,93715.3179––
2020not published17,29153,85388,7765,58715.9195––
2019not published20,48463,83595,6525,91816.2214––
2018not published18,95359,13295,8315,91716.2198314–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025DFDS A/S1,691567+199%376 of 40892.2253−64%DNVB
2024DFDS A/S1,648547+201%356 of 40498.7233−58%DNVC
2023not published712680+5%208 of 386282234+21%DNVB+C
2022not published821626+31%232 of 394278253+10%DNVB+C
2021not published33.4815−96%24 of 3775.00226−98%VerifaviaC
2020not published1,147751+53%244 of 387226217+4%VerifaviaC
2019not published609569+7%210 of 394250223+12%VerifaviaC
2018not published1,882729+158%296 of 361–––VerifaviaC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.