Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

JIUYANG BLOSSOM

IMO: 9318474
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 5,935 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 15.70 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: HOEGH BANGKOK

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: HMC Shipmanagement Co.,Ltd.

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,216 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

112

Vehicle carrier median 104 kg/nm (+7%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

67.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 59.0 (+14%)

Average speed

12.0 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.2 kn (−15%)

Fuel per day at sea

32.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,583 t

CO₂ emitted

17,571 t

Distance sailed

50,043 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,174 h

174 days, 48% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 335 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 102 kg/nm · median 103 (−2%)

80.4Ranks 149 of 335, lowest first120

Average speedThis ship 16.1 kn · median 14.4 (+12%)

12.3Faster than 89% of vehicle carrier ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 53.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.3 (−3%)

37.7Ranks 160 of 335, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU49%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,146 t

6.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

JIUYANG BLOSSOM
Vehicle carrier median

95.0100.0105.0110.0115.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

Average speed, kn

JIUYANG BLOSSOM
Vehicle carrier median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

JIUYANG BLOSSOM
Vehicle carrier median

20.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2024	+1.6 kn	+5%	+17%	−58%	+40%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+2.2 kn	−3%	+15%	+146%	−22%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	−4%	−1%	+30%	−44%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	−8%	−8%	−71%	+32%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.0 kn	+13%	−3%	−6%	+16%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	HMC Shipmanagement Co.,Ltd.	1,967	6,159	19,359	1,202	16.1	102	53.6	–
2022	not published	4,490	13,343	46,439	3,204	14.5	96.7	38.3	–
2021	not published	1,874	5,899	18,901	1,538	12.3	99.2	49.3	–
2020	not published	1,494	4,735	14,500	1,210	12.0	103	88.8	–
2019	not published	5,583	17,571	50,043	4,174	12.0	112	67.3	–
2018	not published	5,264	16,553	53,227	3,802	14.0	98.9	58.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	HMC Shipmanagement Co.,Ltd.	53.6	55.3	−3%	160 of 335	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	38.3	57.7	−34%	31 of 463	DNV	A+C
2021	not published	49.3	59.6	−17%	128 of 459	DNV	A
2020	not published	88.8	57.3	+55%	360 of 449	DNV	A
2019	not published	67.3	59.0	+14%	277 of 426	DNV	A
2018	not published	58.2	62.4	−7%	172 of 434	DNV	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.