Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

KALLIO

IMO: 9319064
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Finland
Port of registry: Helsinki
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.73 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ESL Shipping Oy

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

71.3

General cargo median 57.3 kg/nm (+24%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

19.4

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 21.6 (−10%)

Average speed

10.8 kn

General cargo median 10.8 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

18.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,115 t

CO₂ emitted

9,819 t

Distance sailed

43,672 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,041 h

168 days, 46% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,111 general cargo ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 79.5 kg/nm · median 58.7 (+35%)

34.9Ranks 878 of 1,111, lowest first87.0

Average speedThis ship 9.4 kn · median 10.5 (−10%)

7.8Faster than 24% of general cargo ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 18.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 19.3 (−3%)

7.51Ranks 537 of 1,111, lowest first39.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports69%
From the EU5%
Into the EU8%
At berth in the EU19%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,817 t

18.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

KALLIO
General cargo median

50.060.070.080.090.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

KALLIO
General cargo median

7.08.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

KALLIO
General cargo median

16.018.020.022.024.026.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	+10%	+1%	−23%	+9%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	+2%	−4%	+1%	−12%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+2.7 kn	+0%	+34%	+39%	+14%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−14%	−13%	−0%	−25%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.5 kn	+14%	−12%	−6%	+1%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	+6%	+0%	−33%	–	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	ESL Shipping Oy	1,952	6,179	29,191	3,026	9.6	66.8	–	–
2024	ESL Shipping Oy	2,697	8,502	33,911	3,623	9.4	79.5	–	–
2023	not published	3,211	10,123	44,311	4,364	10.2	72.5	–	–
2022	not published	3,115	9,819	43,672	4,041	10.8	71.3	–	–
2021	not published	2,245	7,078	31,525	3,890	8.1	71.2	–	–
2020	not published	2,620	8,257	31,557	3,991	7.9	83.0	–	–
2019	not published	2,445	7,700	33,731	3,256	10.4	72.5	–	–
2018	not published	3,422	10,783	50,120	4,572	11.0	68.3	20.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	ESL Shipping Oy	–	–	–	–	DNV	C
2024	ESL Shipping Oy	18.7	19.3	−3%	537 of 1,111	DNV	C
2023	not published	17.1	20.7	−17%	387 of 1,045	DNV	C
2022	not published	19.4	21.6	−10%	413 of 1,034	DNV	C
2021	not published	17.1	22.7	−25%	300 of 1,142	DNV	C
2020	not published	22.7	24.5	−7%	496 of 1,167	Lloyd's Register	C
2019	not published	22.4	25.0	−10%	457 of 1,154	Verifavia	C
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.