Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

EUROPALINK

IMO: 9319454
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Napoli
Technical efficiency: EIV 3.83 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A · part of Grimaldi Group

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

189

Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (+20%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

80.6

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 751 (−89%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

139

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 217 (−36%)

Average speed

14.7 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

66.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,892 t

CO₂ emitted

49,831 t

Distance sailed

84,243 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,718 h

238 days, 65% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 183 kg/nm · median 150 (+22%)

69.3Ranks 300 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 15.4 kn · median 15.8 (−3%)

12.0Faster than 43% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 532 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−6%)

66.8Ranks 194 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 95.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−62%)

48.6Ranks 89 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports93%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3,732 t

7.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EUROPALINK
Ro-pax median

140.0160.0180.0200.0220.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EUROPALINK
Ro-pax median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

EUROPALINK
Ro-pax median

50.0100150200250300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

EUROPALINK
Ro-pax median

0.02004006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	−8%	−6%	−7%	−3%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	+4%	+11%	+10%	+264%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	+3%	+5%	+1%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.4 kn	−6%	−14%	−0%	+91%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	+4%	+7%	−2%	−7%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	−3%	−4%	−1%	−20%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.5 kn	−6%	−9%	+19%	−12%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	15,498	48,536	84,858	5,525	15.4	183	–	–
2024part-year	Finnlines Ship Management AB	2,303	7,205	10,356	644	16.1	222	–	–
2024	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	18,001	56,262	91,097	6,060	15.0	198	–	–
2023	not published	15,848	49,569	83,047	5,904	14.1	191	–	–
2022	not published	15,219	47,560	81,987	5,949	13.8	186	–	–
2021	not published	16,171	50,659	82,186	5,416	15.2	197	–	–
2020	not published	15,892	49,831	84,243	5,718	14.7	189	–	–
2019	not published	16,507	51,775	84,949	5,693	14.9	194	–	–
2018	not published	14,733	46,328	71,191	4,616	15.4	207	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	532	567	−6%	194 of 408	95.2	253	−62%	RINA	A
2024part-year	Finnlines Ship Management AB	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	RINA	B
2024	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	550	547	+1%	203 of 404	101	233	−56%	RINA	A
2023	not published	151	680	−78%	79 of 386	169	234	−28%	RINA	B
2022	not published	143	626	−77%	87 of 394	185	253	−27%	RINA	A
2021	not published	74.7	815	−91%	48 of 377	127	226	−44%	RINA	–
2020	not published	80.6	751	−89%	59 of 387	139	217	−36%	RINA	A+B
2019	not published	101	569	−82%	75 of 394	130	223	−41%	RINA	A
2018	not published	114	729	−84%	71 of 361	130	184	−29%	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.