Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

COTE D'ALBATRE

IMO: 9320128
Type: Ro-pax ship
Port of registry: Rouen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 37.31 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DFDS A/S · part of DFDS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

117.7 kg/nm

Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (−22%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

983

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (+73%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

300

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+19%)

Average speed

14.7 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

41.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,385 t

CO₂ emitted

23,033 t

23,396 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

62,776 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,282 h

178 days, 49% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 117.7 kg/nm · median 150.2 (−22%)

69.3Ranks 115 of 408, lowest first232.4

Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 15.8 (−7%)

12.0Faster than 34% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 982.86 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (+73%)

66.76Ranks 298 of 408, lowest first1,568.87

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 300.40 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (+19%)

48.59Ranks 219 of 408, lowest first1,247.19

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports19%
From the EU38%
Into the EU38%
At berth in the EU5%

62% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (14,183 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.4 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

COTE D'ALBATRE
Ro-pax median

100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

COTE D'ALBATRE
Ro-pax median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

COTE D'ALBATRE
Ro-pax median

200250300350400

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

COTE D'ALBATRE
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,0004,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−1%	−1%	+6%	+20%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	−0%	−1%	−7%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	−6%	−10%	+6%	−4%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	+14%	+18%	−19%	−71%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	−9%	−13%	+58%	+73%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+4.7 kn	−3%	+38%	−18%	+88%	4.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−4.3 kn	+2%	−26%	+2%	−46%	4.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	DFDS A/S	7,385	23,033	62,776	4,282	14.7	117.7	–	–
2024	DFDS A/S	7,069	22,050	59,249	4,068	14.6	119.3	–	–
2023	not published	7,581	23,639	63,506	4,311	14.7	119.4	–	–
2022	not published	7,571	23,608	59,858	3,862	15.5	126.5	–	–
2021	not published	8,161	25,433	73,496	4,894	15.0	111.0	–	–
2020	not published	5,696	17,738	46,463	2,982	15.6	122.6	–	–
2019	not published	7,148	22,304	56,694	5,190	10.9	126.1	–	–
2018	not published	6,858	21,466	55,440	3,654	15.2	123.7	492.08	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	DFDS A/S	982.86	566.51	+73%	298 of 408	300.40	253.18	+19%	DNV	B
2024	DFDS A/S	819.01	546.68	+50%	260 of 404	340.50	232.85	+46%	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	861.88	680.04	+27%	233 of 386	332.27	233.94	+42%	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	898.20	626.32	+43%	246 of 394	316.32	252.90	+25%	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	3,090.26	815.19	+279%	353 of 377	378.90	226.00	+68%	Verifavia	B+C
2020	not published	1,789.49	750.91	+138%	318 of 387	250.65	217.49	+15%	Verifavia	B+C
2019	not published	953.27	569.03	+68%	276 of 394	302.76	222.56	+36%	Verifavia	B+C
2018	not published	1,765.70	728.92	+142%	291 of 361	–	–	–	Verifavia	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.