Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

COTE D'ALBATRE

IMO: 9320128
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): France
Port of registry: Rouen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 37.31 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DFDS A/S · part of DFDS

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

119

Ro-pax median 153 kg/nm (−22%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

862

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 680 (+27%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

332

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 234 (+42%)

Average speed

14.7 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

42.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,581 t

CO₂ emitted

23,639 t

Distance sailed

63,506 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,311 h

180 days, 49% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 118 kg/nm · median 150 (−22%)

69.3Ranks 115 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 15.8 (−7%)

12.0Faster than 34% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 983 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+73%)

66.8Ranks 298 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 300 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+19%)

48.6Ranks 219 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU47%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

650 t

2.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

COTE D'ALBATRE
Ro-pax median

100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

COTE D'ALBATRE
Ro-pax median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

COTE D'ALBATRE
Ro-pax median

200250300350400

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

COTE D'ALBATRE
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,0004,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−1%	−1%	+6%	+20%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	−0%	−1%	−7%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	−6%	−10%	+6%	−4%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	+14%	+18%	−19%	−71%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	−9%	−13%	+58%	+73%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+4.7 kn	−3%	+38%	−18%	+88%	4.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−4.3 kn	+2%	−26%	+2%	−46%	4.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	DFDS A/S	7,385	23,033	62,776	4,282	14.7	118	–	–
2024	DFDS A/S	7,069	22,050	59,249	4,068	14.6	119	–	–
2023	not published	7,581	23,639	63,506	4,311	14.7	119	–	–
2022	not published	7,571	23,608	59,858	3,862	15.5	127	–	–
2021	not published	8,161	25,433	73,496	4,894	15.0	111	–	–
2020	not published	5,696	17,738	46,463	2,982	15.6	123	–	–
2019	not published	7,148	22,304	56,694	5,190	10.9	126	–	–
2018	not published	6,858	21,466	55,440	3,654	15.2	124	492	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	DFDS A/S	983	567	+73%	298 of 408	300	253	+19%	DNV	B
2024	DFDS A/S	819	547	+50%	260 of 404	341	233	+46%	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	862	680	+27%	233 of 386	332	234	+42%	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	898	626	+43%	246 of 394	316	253	+25%	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	3,090	815	+279%	353 of 377	379	226	+68%	Verifavia	B+C
2020	not published	1,789	751	+138%	318 of 387	251	217	+15%	Verifavia	B+C
2019	not published	953	569	+68%	276 of 394	303	223	+36%	Verifavia	B+C
2018	not published	1,766	729	+142%	291 of 361	–	–	–	Verifavia	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.