Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

LADY LAURA

IMO: 9321108
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.82 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: FWN BONAFIDE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ForestWave Navigation BV

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

50.0 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+42%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

24.37

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (−4%)

Average speed

10.8 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+16%)

Fuel per day at sea

13.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,380 t

CO₂ emitted

4,339 t

4,407 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

27,580 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,548 h

106 days, 29% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 50.0 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+42%)

17.4Ranks 1,870 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 9.3 (+16%)

7.0Faster than 76% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 24.37 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (−4%)

10.14Ranks 1,231 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU36%
Into the EU56%
At berth in the EU3%

13% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (569 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

LADY LAURA
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.070.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LADY LAURA
General cargo median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

LADY LAURA
General cargo median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	−16%	−16%	+354%	−48%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.6 kn	+6%	+1%	−61%	+79%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	+8%	+9%	−11%	+9%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	−0%	−9%	−61%	–	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.7 kn	+7%	+36%	+32%	–	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	−4%	−8%	−28%	−23%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.5 kn	−17%	−12%	−1%	+5%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	ForestWave Navigation BV	1,062	3,329	20,470	1,875	10.9	51.9	–	–
2025	GN Denizcilik ve Acentelik LTD. STI.	1,380	4,339	27,580	2,548	10.8	50.0	–	–
2024	ForestWave Navigation BV	360	1,132	6,080	557	10.9	59.3	–	–
2023	not published	879	2,767	15,745	1,366	11.5	55.8	–	–
2022	not published	912	2,861	17,668	1,556	11.4	51.6	–	–
2021	not published	2,333	7,363	45,166	3,621	12.5	51.7	25.49	–
2020	not published	1,661	5,244	34,274	3,510	9.8	48.5	–	–
2019	not published	2,427	7,634	47,916	4,691	10.2	50.6	–	–
2018	not published	2,929	9,214	48,248	4,986	9.7	60.7	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	ForestWave Navigation BV	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	B
2025	GN Denizcilik ve Acentelik LTD. STI.	24.37	25.45	−4%	1,231 of 2,706	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	ForestWave Navigation BV	46.60	19.25	+142%	1,035 of 1,111	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2023	not published	26.02	20.67	+26%	727 of 1,045	Lloyd's Register	B
2022	not published	23.77	21.57	+10%	595 of 1,034	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	21.10	24.50	−14%	418 of 1,167	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	27.33	24.96	+9%	665 of 1,154	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	26.08	24.89	+5%	565 of 1,044	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.