Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

METHANE NILE EAGLE

IMO
9321770
Type
LNG carrier
Flag (estimated)
Bermuda
Port of registry
Hamilton
Technical efficiency
EIV 11.79 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
324
LNG carrier median 297 kg/nm (+9%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
12.5
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.7 (+17%)
Average speed
13.6 kn
LNG carrier median 14.7 kn (−7%)
Fuel per day at sea
105.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
12,530 t
CO₂ emitted
34,519 t
Distance sailed
38,691 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,841 h
118 days, 32% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2021

Set against all 289 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2021 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 350 kg/nm · median 257 (+36%)
171Ranks 228 of 289, lowest first378
Average speedThis ship 14.5 kn · median 14.6 (−1%)
11.4Faster than 47% of LNG carrier ships16.7
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 15.0 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 10.5 (+44%)
5.77Ranks 231 of 289, lowest first20.3
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU50%
  • Into the EU47%
  • At berth in the EU3%
Fuel burned laden
5,889 t
47% of all fuel; 53% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
970 t
2.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • METHANE NILE EAGLE
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • METHANE NILE EAGLE
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • METHANE NILE EAGLE
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2020→2021+0.9 kn+8%+15%+56%+20%0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−0.2 kn+8%+7%+187%−27%Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019−1.2 kn−10%−17%−19%+90%1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2021LNG / alt.not published21,03558,20860,1684,15214.5350–42%
2020LNG / alt.not published12,53034,51938,6912,84113.6324–47%
2019LNG / alt.not published4,03011,11513,49597713.8299–34%
2018LNG / alt.not published5,48415,13216,5601,10715.0331–75%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2021LNG / alt.not published15.010.5+44%231 of 289ABSB+C
2020LNG / alt.not published12.510.7+17%183 of 267ABSB+C
2019LNG / alt.not published17.110.9+57%212 of 248ABSB+C
2018LNG / alt.not published9.0010.9−18%53 of 197ABSB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.