Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

METHANE NILE EAGLE

IMO: 9321770
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bermuda
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EIV 11.79 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

350

LNG carrier median 257 kg/nm (+36%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

15.0

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.5 (+44%)

Average speed

14.5 kn

LNG carrier median 14.6 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

121.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

21,035 t

CO₂ emitted

58,208 t

Distance sailed

60,168 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,152 h

173 days, 47% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2021

Set against all 289 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2021 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 350 kg/nm · median 257 (+36%)

171Ranks 228 of 289, lowest first378

Average speedThis ship 14.5 kn · median 14.6 (−1%)

11.4Faster than 47% of LNG carrier ships16.7

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 15.0 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 10.5 (+44%)

5.77Ranks 231 of 289, lowest first20.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU43%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

8,919 t

42% of all fuel; 58% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,508 t

2.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

METHANE NILE EAGLE
LNG carrier median

250.0275.0300.0325.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021

Average speed, kn

METHANE NILE EAGLE
LNG carrier median

13.514.014.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

METHANE NILE EAGLE
LNG carrier median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2020→2021	+0.9 kn	+8%	+15%	+56%	+20%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	+8%	+7%	+187%	−27%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.2 kn	−10%	−17%	−19%	+90%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2021LNG / alt.	not published	21,035	58,208	60,168	4,152	14.5	350	–	42%
2020LNG / alt.	not published	12,530	34,519	38,691	2,841	13.6	324	–	47%
2019LNG / alt.	not published	4,030	11,115	13,495	977	13.8	299	–	34%
2018LNG / alt.	not published	5,484	15,132	16,560	1,107	15.0	331	–	75%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2021LNG / alt.	not published	15.0	10.5	+44%	231 of 289	ABS	B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	12.5	10.7	+17%	183 of 267	ABS	B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	17.1	10.9	+57%	212 of 248	ABS	B+C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	9.00	10.9	−18%	53 of 197	ABS	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.