Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

GINGA COUGAR

IMO: 9321861
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 14,895 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EIV 9.93 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Unix Line Pte Ltd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 14,895 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

92.7 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+16%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

19.69

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+31%)

Average speed

12.1 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

818 t

CO₂ emitted

2,589 t

2,629 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

8,826 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

731 h

30 days, 8% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 92.7 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+16%)

52.8Ranks 1,048 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 11.1 (+9%)

8.8Faster than 82% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 19.69 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+31%)

7.93Ranks 931 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports29%
From the EU13%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU14%

72% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,856 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

14.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

GINGA COUGAR
Chemical tanker median

75.080.085.090.095.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

GINGA COUGAR
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GINGA COUGAR
Chemical tanker median

10.012.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2025	+0.6 kn	+15%	+20%	−4%	+65%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	−9%	−3%	−61%	−10%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	+3%	−6%	+2%	−27%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+2%	−2%	+169%	+50%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	−11%	−11%	+111%	−24%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.3 kn	−4%	+7%	−84%	+15%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Unix Line Pte Ltd	818	2,589	8,826	731	12.1	92.7	19.69	–
2023	not published	742	2,326	9,192	800	11.5	80.7	11.96	–
2022	not published	2,102	6,603	23,825	2,181	10.9	88.2	13.29	–
2021	not published	1,996	6,266	23,379	1,937	12.1	85.4	18.23	–
2020	not published	731	2,287	8,703	697	12.5	84.0	12.19	–
2019	not published	391	1,233	4,131	330	12.5	94.7	16.08	–
2018	not published	2,492	7,849	25,149	2,245	11.2	99.1	14.00	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Unix Line Pte Ltd	19.69	15.04	+31%	931 of 1,460	ClassNK	B
2023	not published	11.96	16.23	−26%	357 of 1,314	ClassNK	B
2022	not published	13.29	16.06	−17%	495 of 1,409	ClassNK	B
2021	not published	18.23	16.69	+9%	770 of 1,343	ClassNK	B
2020	not published	12.19	16.16	−25%	344 of 1,312	ClassNK	B
2019	not published	16.08	17.32	−7%	583 of 1,321	ClassNK	B
2018	not published	14.00	17.14	−18%	450 of 1,294	ClassNK	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.