Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

Unix Line Pte Ltd
Ships18
CO₂ emitted70 kt−30.2%
Fuel per mile79 kg/nm
Average speed11.4 kn
CO₂ at berth7.2%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentChemical tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0

  • Unix Line Pte Ltd13.7 (−9%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Unix Line Pte Ltd1813.7−9%7911.41,4427.2%–
Segment median 15.00%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Unix Line Pte LtdClassNK (18)0%100%0%0%

Unix Line Pte Ltd: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
GINGA COUGAR9321861Chemical tanker19.7 g CO₂/t·nm15.2+29%12.12,589 t€97k
GINGA LYNX9442550Chemical tanker16.9 g CO₂/t·nm15.2+11%11.611,260 t€336k
HAKUBA GALAXY9804916Chemical tanker15.0 g CO₂/t·nm15.2−1%11.76,028 t€170k
GINGA BOBCAT9472737Chemical tanker11.2 g CO₂/t·nm11.5−3%10.3700 t€18k
FURANO GALAXY9804928Chemical tanker14.6 g CO₂/t·nm15.2−4%9.87,311 t€217k
NISEKO GALAXY9804930Chemical tanker14.2 g CO₂/t·nm15.2−7%12.34,084 t€145k
HARMONICS9799680Chemical tanker10.5 g CO₂/t·nm11.5−8%11.74,540 t€138k
DIVA9760548Chemical tanker13.9 g CO₂/t·nm15.2−9%11.36,145 t€209k
GINGA LION9278727Chemical tanker13.7 g CO₂/t·nm15.2−10%11.33,337 t€96k
NAEBA GALAXY9791169Chemical tanker13.4 g CO₂/t·nm15.2−12%11.53,293 t€91k
GINGA CARACAL9426300Chemical tanker13.3 g CO₂/t·nm15.2−13%12.15,725 t€179k
GINGA MAYA9339351Chemical tanker17.8 g CO₂/t·nm21.4−17%9.01,691 t€61k
GINGA PUMA9343780Chemical tanker17.2 g CO₂/t·nm21.4−20%14.5504 t€13k
JAZZ9804849Chemical tanker12.2 g CO₂/t·nm15.2−20%11.58,554 t€258k
GALLOP9799678Chemical tanker8.5 g CO₂/t·nm11.5−26%12.62,841 t€82k
GINGA OCELOT9581423Chemical tanker8.3 g CO₂/t·nm11.5−28%12.4211 t€6k
ENSEMBLE9749453Chemical tanker7.2 g CO₂/t·nm11.5−37%11.7553 t€14k

30 of 18 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.