Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM ISKENDERUN

IMO: 9321902
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 25,772 t
Port of registry: Valetta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.10 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: NORDSUMMER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM SA · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 25,772 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

157.7 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−11%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

19.27

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+18%)

Average speed

6.7 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−50%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,093 t

CO₂ emitted

19,188 t

19,488 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

38,638 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,779 h

241 days, 66% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 157.7 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−11%)

78.8Ranks 980 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 6.7 kn · median 13.3 (−50%)

9.1Faster than 3% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 19.27 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+18%)

7.22Ranks 1,303 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports32%
From the EU28%
Into the EU32%
At berth in the EU8%

70% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (13,392 t).

Fuel burned laden

92%

8% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

7.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CMA CGM ISKENDERUN
Container median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0220.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM ISKENDERUN
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM ISKENDERUN
Container median

10.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−3.1 kn	−4%	−34%	−9%	−2%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−2.2 kn	+15%	−6%	+40%	−11%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−3.1 kn	−28%	−43%	+1%	−7%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 28%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.0 kn	−1%	−13%	−56%	+9%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+5.7 kn	+45%	+118%	+43%	+15%	5.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 45%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+4.5 kn	−18%	+37%	+118%	−6%	4.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−6.0 kn	+28%	−32%	−40%	+58%	6.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 28%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM SA	6,093	19,188	38,638	5,779	6.7	157.7	19.27	92%
2024	CMA CGM SA	6,956	21,705	42,376	4,324	9.8	164.2	19.67	94%
2023	not published	4,325	13,535	30,275	2,518	12.0	142.8	22.04	89%
2022	not published	5,993	18,851	30,031	1,991	15.1	199.6	23.74	86%
2021	not published	13,818	43,706	68,540	4,000	17.1	201.6	21.77	–
2020	not published	6,661	21,020	48,027	4,206	11.4	138.7	18.96	–
2019	not published	3,723	11,624	22,062	3,217	6.9	168.7	20.15	–
2018	not published	4,867	15,160	36,776	2,860	12.9	132.3	12.76	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM SA	19.27	16.30	+18%	1,303 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM SA	19.67	17.52	+12%	1,117 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	22.04	19.40	+14%	1,088 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	23.74	19.13	+24%	1,108 of 1,825	ABS	B
2021	not published	21.77	17.90	+22%	1,072 of 1,781	EMICERT	B
2020	not published	18.96	17.58	+8%	969 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	20.15	18.88	+7%	973 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	12.76	20.22	−37%	414 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.