Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM ISKENDERUN

IMO: 9321902
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 25,772 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valetta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.10 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: NORDSUMMER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM SA · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 23,084 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

139

Container median 172 kg/nm (−19%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

19.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (+8%)

Average speed

11.4 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (−19%)

Fuel per day at sea

38.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,661 t

CO₂ emitted

21,020 t

Distance sailed

48,027 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,206 h

175 days, 48% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 158 kg/nm · median 177 (−11%)

78.8Ranks 980 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 6.7 kn · median 13.3 (−50%)

9.1Faster than 3% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 19.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+18%)

7.22Ranks 1,303 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports55%
From the EU25%
Into the EU13%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,375 t

6.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM ISKENDERUN
Container median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0220.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM ISKENDERUN
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM ISKENDERUN
Container median

10.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−3.1 kn	−4%	−34%	−9%	−2%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−2.2 kn	+15%	−6%	+40%	−11%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−3.1 kn	−28%	−43%	+1%	−7%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 28%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.0 kn	−1%	−13%	−56%	+9%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+5.7 kn	+45%	+118%	+43%	+15%	5.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 45%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+4.5 kn	−18%	+37%	+118%	−6%	4.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−6.0 kn	+28%	−32%	−40%	+58%	6.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 28%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM SA	6,093	19,188	38,638	5,779	6.7	158	19.3	92%
2024	CMA CGM SA	6,956	21,705	42,376	4,324	9.8	164	19.7	94%
2023	not published	4,325	13,535	30,275	2,518	12.0	143	22.0	89%
2022	not published	5,993	18,851	30,031	1,991	15.1	200	23.7	86%
2021	not published	13,818	43,706	68,540	4,000	17.1	202	21.8	–
2020	not published	6,661	21,020	48,027	4,206	11.4	139	19.0	–
2019	not published	3,723	11,624	22,062	3,217	6.9	169	20.2	–
2018	not published	4,867	15,160	36,776	2,860	12.9	132	12.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM SA	19.3	16.3	+18%	1,303 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM SA	19.7	17.5	+12%	1,117 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	22.0	19.4	+14%	1,088 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	23.7	19.1	+24%	1,108 of 1,825	ABS	B
2021	not published	21.8	17.9	+22%	1,072 of 1,781	EMICERT	B
2020	not published	19.0	17.6	+8%	969 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	20.2	18.9	+7%	973 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	12.8	20.2	−37%	414 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.