Navalyze · Container · Ship

ZIM YOKOHAMA

IMO: 9322346
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 24,000 t
Flag (estimated): Israel
Port of registry: Haifa
Technical efficiency: EIV 19.58 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 28,628 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

195

Container median 186 kg/nm (+5%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

21.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (+19%)

Average speed

15.9 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

74.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,547 t

CO₂ emitted

39,145 t

Distance sailed

64,255 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,045 h

169 days, 46% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2022

Set against all 1,825 container ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 204 kg/nm · median 178 (+15%)

77.9Ranks 1,044 of 1,825, lowest first314

Average speedThis ship 16.6 kn · median 13.6 (+22%)

10.1Faster than 94% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 26.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.1 (+39%)

7.44Ranks 1,203 of 1,825, lowest first52.6

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports14%
From the EU46%
Into the EU38%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,276 t

3.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ZIM YOKOHAMA
Container median

140.0160.0180.0200.0220.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022

Average speed, kn

ZIM YOKOHAMA
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ZIM YOKOHAMA
Container median

15.020.025.030.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2021→2022	+0.7 kn	+5%	+9%	−14%	+25%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+2.1 kn	+27%	+47%	−5%	+32%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	−4%	−4%	−2%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2022	not published	11,277	35,219	55,189	3,328	16.6	204	26.6	–
2021	not published	12,547	39,145	64,255	4,045	15.9	195	21.3	–
2020	not published	10,371	32,379	67,653	4,917	13.8	153	16.1	–
2019	not published	11,042	34,464	69,266	5,044	13.7	159	16.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2022	not published	26.6	19.1	+39%	1,203 of 1,825	Lloyd's Register	A
2021	not published	21.3	17.9	+19%	1,056 of 1,781	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	16.1	17.6	−8%	798 of 1,797	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	16.8	18.9	−11%	771 of 1,788	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.