Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

LNG BORNO

IMO: 9322803
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bermuda
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.39 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd. · part of NYK

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

283

LNG carrier median 257 kg/nm (+10%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

12.8

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.5 (+22%)

Average speed

14.6 kn

LNG carrier median 14.6 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

99.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,826 t

CO₂ emitted

27,053 t

Distance sailed

34,726 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,378 h

99 days, 27% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 302 kg/nm · median 190 (+58%)

152Ranks 327 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 13.0 kn · median 14.4 (−10%)

11.2Faster than 22% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 12.3 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+73%)

5.06Ranks 327 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU52%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

655 t

2.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LNG BORNO
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LNG BORNO
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

LNG BORNO
LNG carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.1 kn	+2%	+21%	−77%	–	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.5 kn	−6%	−17%	+40%	–	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	+18%	+23%	+11%	−8%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.7 kn	−5%	−23%	−18%	−3%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	+9%	+15%	−42%	+40%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−1.3 kn	−9%	−17%	+40%	−25%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.9 kn	+1%	−10%	+38%	−6%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd.	3,036	8,356	10,065	775	13.0	302	–	–
2024LNG	NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd.	13,000	35,949	43,861	4,008	10.9	296	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	9,904	27,276	31,323	2,530	12.4	316	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	7,593	20,922	28,323	2,380	11.9	268	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	9,826	27,053	34,726	2,378	14.6	283	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	15,446	42,659	59,603	4,311	13.8	259	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	12,167	34,796	42,494	2,805	15.1	286	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	8,708	25,183	30,800	1,812	17.0	283	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd.	12.3	7.12	+73%	327 of 386	ClassNK	B+C
2024LNG	NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	11.4	9.10	+25%	251 of 355	ClassNK	A+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	12.4	10.4	+20%	250 of 379	ClassNK	A+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	12.8	10.5	+22%	197 of 289	ClassNK	A+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	9.12	10.7	−15%	86 of 267	ClassNK	A+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	12.1	10.9	+11%	154 of 248	ClassNK	A+C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	12.9	10.9	+18%	140 of 197	ClassNK	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.