Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd.your view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd. | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 6 |
| CO₂ emitted | 121 kt−52.9% |
| Fuel per mile | 256 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 13.9 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 2.8% |
| Ships burning LNG | 5 |
| Main segment | LNG carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
LNG carrier
CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.1
- NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd.10.0 (+40% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd. | 6 | 10.0 | +40% | 256 | 13.9 | 2,433 | 2.8% | 5 |
| Segment median | 7.1 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd. | ClassNK (6) | 33% | 50% | 100% | 0% |
NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd.: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNG BORNOLNG | 9322803 | LNG carrier | 12.3 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +73% | 13.0 | 8,356 t | €224k |
| LNG OGUNLNG | 9322815 | LNG carrier | 11.4 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +61% | 13.0 | 18,988 t | €502k |
| MALANJELNG | 9490959 | LNG carrier | 10.0 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +40% | 13.0 | 37,129 t | €995k |
| CUBALLNG | 9491812 | LNG carrier | 9.8 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +38% | 15.2 | 44,600 t | €1.2m |
| GRACE EMILIALNG | 9884174 | LNG carrier | 6.5 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | −8% | 14.4 | 8,322 t | €224k |
30 of 6 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.