Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

LNG OGUN

IMO: 9322815
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bermuda
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.39 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd. · part of NYK

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

270

LNG carrier median 257 kg/nm (+5%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

10.8

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.5 (+3%)

Average speed

14.0 kn

LNG carrier median 14.6 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

90.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

19,826 t

CO₂ emitted

54,579 t

Distance sailed

73,436 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,239 h

218 days, 60% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 277 kg/nm · median 190 (+46%)

152Ranks 304 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 13.0 kn · median 14.4 (−10%)

11.2Faster than 22% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 11.4 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+61%)

5.06Ranks 322 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU43%
Into the EU53%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

955 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LNG OGUN
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LNG OGUN
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

LNG OGUN
LNG carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	+3%	+5%	+9%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.6 kn	−7%	−3%	+114%	–	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	+0%	−1%	−61%	+9%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	−1.6 kn	+7%	−6%	−62%	+13%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.0 kn	+3%	+11%	+1%	+20%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.0 kn	−14%	−25%	+767%	−28%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+4.3 kn	+8%	+51%	−74%	−2%	4.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd.	6,900	18,988	24,890	1,921	13.0	277	–	–
2024LNG	NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd.	6,155	16,945	22,894	1,794	12.8	269	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	3,097	8,526	10,714	878	12.2	289	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	7,955	21,904	27,622	2,232	12.4	288	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	19,826	54,579	73,436	5,239	14.0	270	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	19,117	52,682	73,048	5,626	13.0	262	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	2,560	7,409	8,427	562	15.0	304	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	9,221	26,538	32,802	3,052	10.7	281	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd.	11.4	7.12	+61%	322 of 386	ClassNK	A+C
2024LNG	NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	13.3	9.10	+46%	287 of 355	ClassNK	A+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	12.2	10.4	+18%	243 of 379	ClassNK	A+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	10.8	10.5	+3%	150 of 289	ClassNK	A+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	9.00	10.7	−16%	79 of 267	ClassNK	A+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	12.5	10.9	+15%	164 of 248	ClassNK	A+C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	12.8	10.9	+17%	138 of 197	ClassNK	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.