Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM ALIAGA

IMO: 9323039
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 22,022 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valetta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: NORDAUTUMN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM SA · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 21,371 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

141

Container median 182 kg/nm (−22%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

20.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+2%)

Average speed

10.6 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−23%)

Fuel per day at sea

35.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,615 t

CO₂ emitted

23,860 t

Distance sailed

54,064 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,089 h

212 days, 58% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 127 kg/nm · median 177 (−28%)

78.8Ranks 760 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 13.3 (−19%)

9.1Faster than 20% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+11%)

7.22Ranks 1,234 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports68%
From the EU16%
Into the EU13%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

568 t

2.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM ALIAGA
Container median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM ALIAGA
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM ALIAGA
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.4 kn	−22%	−9%	−48%	−3%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−2.7 kn	+12%	−13%	+1%	−26%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−4.6 kn	−25%	−45%	−26%	+19%	4.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+4%	+1%	−22%	−47%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+7.2 kn	+30%	+124%	+85%	+104%	7.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 30%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	−8%	−3%	+171%	+39%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	+9%	−3%	−78%	−32%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM SA	2,300	7,225	18,095	1,668	10.8	127	18.1	74%
2024	CMA CGM SA	5,622	17,544	34,710	3,698	9.4	162	18.7	94%
2023	not published	4,950	15,483	34,323	2,836	12.1	144	25.2	92%
2022	not published	8,860	28,080	46,341	2,773	16.7	191	21.2	92%
2021	not published	10,882	34,445	59,310	3,455	17.2	184	40.1	–
2020	not published	4,531	14,297	32,068	3,218	10.0	141	19.6	–
2019	not published	1,813	5,654	11,855	1,242	9.5	153	14.1	–
2018	not published	7,615	23,860	54,064	5,089	10.6	141	20.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM SA	18.1	16.3	+11%	1,234 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM SA	18.7	17.5	+7%	1,056 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	25.2	19.4	+30%	1,191 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	21.2	19.1	+11%	996 of 1,825	ABS	B
2021	not published	40.1	17.9	+124%	1,485 of 1,781	EMICERT	B
2020	not published	19.6	17.6	+12%	1,005 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	14.1	18.9	−25%	572 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	20.7	20.2	+2%	873 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.