Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM ABIDJAN

IMO: 9323481
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 13,743 t
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.40 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: HANSA LIMBURG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM SA · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 13,743 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

112.7 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−36%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

25.94

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+59%)

Average speed

6.8 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−49%)

Fuel per day at sea

18.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,407 t

CO₂ emitted

10,776 t

10,943 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

30,226 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,444 h

185 days, 51% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 112.7 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−36%)

78.8Ranks 645 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 6.8 kn · median 13.3 (−49%)

9.1Faster than 3% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 25.94 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+59%)

7.22Ranks 1,588 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports45%
From the EU15%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU9%

77% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (8,309 t).

Fuel burned laden

91%

9% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

9.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CMA CGM ABIDJAN
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM ABIDJAN
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM ABIDJAN
Container median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−2.8 kn	+10%	−22%	−3%	−15%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.9 kn	−0%	−17%	−20%	+8%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	−7%	−6%	+5%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	+17%	+19%	−27%	+41%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	−4%	−9%	−17%	−14%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.0 kn	−11%	+7%	+44%	−16%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.6 kn	+3%	+23%	+44%	+27%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM SA	3,407	10,776	30,226	4,444	6.8	112.7	25.94	91%
2024	CMA CGM SA	3,210	10,046	31,217	3,257	9.6	102.8	30.44	91%
2023	not published	4,001	12,557	38,810	3,373	11.5	103.1	28.10	95%
2022	not published	4,087	12,920	36,892	3,223	11.4	110.8	31.58	84%
2021	not published	4,765	14,902	50,272	4,464	11.3	94.8	22.39	–
2020	not published	5,994	18,718	60,786	5,113	11.9	98.6	26.09	–
2019	not published	4,707	14,702	42,322	4,294	9.9	111.2	30.98	–
2018	not published	3,173	9,907	29,458	3,554	8.3	107.7	24.46	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM SA	25.94	16.30	+59%	1,588 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM SA	30.44	17.52	+74%	1,467 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	28.10	19.40	+45%	1,301 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	31.58	19.13	+65%	1,330 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	22.39	17.90	+25%	1,099 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	26.09	17.58	+48%	1,253 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	30.98	18.88	+64%	1,286 of 1,788	DNV	–
2018	not published	24.46	20.22	+21%	1,026 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.