Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC IRA II

IMO
9323493
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
8,991 t
Flag (estimated)
Liberia
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EEXI 18.40 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
X-PRESS IRAZU

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

?
?

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,527 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
90.9
Container median 178 kg/nm (−49%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
33.3
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (+74%)
Average speed
15.0 kn
Container median 13.6 kn (+10%)
Fuel per day at sea
32.7 t/day
Fuel consumed
6,743 t
CO₂ emitted
21,036 t
Distance sailed
74,169 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,949 h
206 days, 56% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 107 kg/nm · median 177 (−39%)
78.8Ranks 605 of 2,208, lowest first302
Average speedThis ship 7.1 kn · median 13.3 (−47%)
9.1Faster than 3% of container ships16.0
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 37.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+128%)
7.22Ranks 1,828 of 2,208, lowest first46.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports10%
  • From the EU33%
  • Into the EU56%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
318 t
1.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • MSC IRA II
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • MSC IRA II
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • MSC IRA II
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+2.8 kn−11%+48%−1%+2%2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−7.6 kn+21%−56%−66%+13%7.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023−3.1 kn+9%−13%−19%−3%3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+2.6 kn−16%+1%+27%+17%2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021+3.5 kn−0%+39%+857%–3.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED2,1506,70920,0652,8207.110737.2–
2024MSC Shipmanagement Ltd2,4397,61620,3144,7034.312036.5–
2023not published6,00018,74360,3195,07611.999.532.2–
2022not published6,74321,03674,1694,94915.090.933.3–
2021not published6,32619,73058,1944,69212.410928.5–
2020not published6612,0606,0796828.9109260–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2025MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED37.216.3+128%1,828 of 2,208DNVB+C
2024MSC Shipmanagement Ltd36.517.5+109%1,567 of 1,974DNVB+C
2023not published32.219.4+66%1,388 of 1,899DNVB+C
2022not published33.319.1+74%1,367 of 1,825Korean RegisterA
2021not published28.517.9+59%1,259 of 1,781Korean RegisterA
2020not published––––Korean RegisterA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.