Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

NEO ENERGY

IMO: 9324277
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EIV 12.52 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

339

LNG carrier median 297 kg/nm (+14%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

13.1

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.7 (+23%)

Average speed

14.5 kn

LNG carrier median 14.7 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

117.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

18,164 t

CO₂ emitted

50,047 t

Distance sailed

53,544 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,701 h

154 days, 42% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 357 kg/nm · median 231 (+55%)

167Ranks 317 of 355, lowest first359

Average speedThis ship 11.1 kn · median 14.2 (−22%)

10.7Faster than 12% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 14.0 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (+54%)

5.47Ranks 301 of 355, lowest first17.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU47%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,021 t

2.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NEO ENERGY
LNG carrier median

200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

NEO ENERGY
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

NEO ENERGY
LNG carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	−9%	−2%	+74%	−59%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−5.5 kn	−0%	−35%	+54%	+75%	5.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.4 kn	+16%	+27%	−79%	+50%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+1.8 kn	+6%	+21%	+152%	−2%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023LNG / alt.	not published	10,604	30,208	29,721	2,677	11.1	357	–	–
2022	not published	6,702	20,766	17,123	1,654	10.4	391	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	4,373	12,793	11,122	702	15.9	393	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	18,164	50,047	53,544	3,701	14.5	339	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	6,785	19,213	21,270	1,668	12.7	319	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023LNG / alt.	not published	14.0	9.10	+54%	301 of 355	Korean Register	B+C
2022	not published	34.4	10.4	+231%	352 of 379	Korean Register	B+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	19.7	10.5	+88%	258 of 289	Korean Register	B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	13.1	10.7	+23%	190 of 267	Korean Register	B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	13.4	10.9	+23%	173 of 248	Korean Register	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.