Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

CHEIKH EL MOKRANI

IMO: 9324332
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 12,701 t
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EIV 9.89 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 15,787 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

462

Gas carrier (LPG) median 89.3 kg/nm (+417%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

80.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 42.3 (+91%)

Average speed

11.8 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.7 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

130.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

21,451 t

CO₂ emitted

59,281 t

Distance sailed

46,463 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,933 h

164 days, 45% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 221 kg/nm · median 81.5 (+171%)

49.8Ranks 349 of 355, lowest first124

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 12.6 (−14%)

8.8Faster than 24% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 48.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.6 (+36%)

14.4Ranks 220 of 355, lowest first120

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU42%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU23%

Fuel burned laden

7,722 t

36% of all fuel; 64% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

13,374 t

22.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CHEIKH EL MOKRANI
Gas carrier (LPG) median

0.0200.0400.0600.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CHEIKH EL MOKRANI
Gas carrier (LPG) median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CHEIKH EL MOKRANI
Gas carrier (LPG) median

20.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−5.8 kn	−25%	−51%	+18%	−6%	5.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.9 kn	−12%	+7%	−2%	−8%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+2.3 kn	−28%	−12%	+39%	−34%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+3%	+2%	−12%	+12%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	−4%	−6%	−7%	−7%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+3.1 kn	+11%	+50%	−4%	+5%	3.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.5 kn	−15%	−27%	+29%	−3%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA	13,510	37,584	61,177	5,668	10.8	221	48.4	41%
2024LNG	HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA	15,142	41,714	51,703	3,110	16.6	293	51.2	42%
2023LNG / alt.	not published	17,559	48,357	52,940	3,854	13.7	332	55.6	42%
2022LNG / alt.	not published	17,470	48,572	38,119	3,358	11.4	458	84.2	38%
2021LNG / alt.	not published	19,123	52,879	43,077	3,730	11.5	444	75.2	38%
2020LNG / alt.	not published	21,451	59,281	46,463	3,933	11.8	462	80.8	36%
2019LNG / alt.	not published	20,190	56,298	48,509	5,544	8.7	416	76.9	60%
2018LNG / alt.	not published	18,352	50,645	37,544	3,668	10.2	489	78.9	49%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA	48.4	35.6	+36%	220 of 355	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2024LNG	HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA	51.2	35.8	+43%	197 of 306	Bureau Veritas	B
2023LNG / alt.	not published	55.6	41.8	+33%	203 of 330	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	84.2	42.5	+98%	265 of 348	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	75.2	46.9	+60%	225 of 323	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	80.8	42.3	+91%	255 of 339	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	76.9	45.9	+68%	234 of 331	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	78.9	53.1	+49%	193 of 297	Bureau Veritas	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.