Navalyze

Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

CHEIKH BOUAMAMA

IMO
9324344
Type
Gas carrier
Average cargo carried
14,306 t
Flag (estimated)
Bahamas
Port of registry
Nassau
Technical efficiency
EIV 9.96 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA

?
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 16,624 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
443
Gas carrier (LPG) median 89.3 kg/nm (+396%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
73.4
g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 42.3 (+74%)
Average speed
11.5 kn
Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.7 kn (−9%)
Fuel per day at sea
122.6 t/day
Fuel consumed
19,508 t
CO₂ emitted
53,776 t
Distance sailed
44,067 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,818 h
159 days, 44% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 288 kg/nm · median 81.5 (+253%)
49.8Ranks 352 of 355, lowest first124
Average speedThis ship 9.8 kn · median 12.6 (−22%)
8.8Faster than 14% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 55.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.6 (+56%)
14.4Ranks 237 of 355, lowest first120
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU35%
  • Into the EU38%
  • At berth in the EU27%
Fuel burned laden
7,472 t
38% of all fuel; 62% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
14,310 t
26.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • CHEIKH BOUAMAMA
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

Average speed, kn

  • CHEIKH BOUAMAMA
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • CHEIKH BOUAMAMA
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−1.7 kn−19%−31%+19%−22%1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024−0.3 kn−12%−15%+26%+10%0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−0.6 kn+3%−1%−6%−6%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+0.0 kn−7%−7%+6%−1%Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021+0.9 kn−4%+3%−6%−5%0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+1.9 kn+13%+36%−10%+16%1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−2.1 kn+4%−15%+37%−1%2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025LNGHYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA17,74149,08361,7066,3149.828855.651%
2024LNGHYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA18,46950,85951,8594,52811.535671.649%
2023LNG / alt.not published16,76946,24341,2843,49211.840665.242%
2022LNG / alt.not published17,32947,71544,1493,55512.439369.238%
2021LNG / alt.not published17,58648,48241,5193,35812.442470.041%
2020LNG / alt.not published19,50853,77644,0673,81811.544373.438%
2019LNG / alt.not published19,25453,36349,0365,1269.639363.467%
2018LNG / alt.not published13,46737,43735,6953,05811.737764.257%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmGas carrier (LPG) medianvs Gas carrier (LPG)RankVerifierMethods
2025LNGHYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA55.635.6+56%237 of 355Bureau VeritasB+C
2024LNGHYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA71.635.8+100%225 of 306Bureau VeritasB
2023LNG / alt.not published65.241.8+56%219 of 330Bureau VeritasB+C
2022LNG / alt.not published69.242.5+63%242 of 348Bureau VeritasB+C
2021LNG / alt.not published70.046.9+49%217 of 323Bureau VeritasB+C
2020LNG / alt.not published73.442.3+74%241 of 339Bureau VeritasB+C
2019LNG / alt.not published63.445.9+38%206 of 331Bureau VeritasB+C
2018LNG / alt.not published64.253.1+21%169 of 297Bureau VeritasB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.