Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

AL AREESH

IMO: 9325697
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.40 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Seapeak Maritime Limited · part of Seapeak

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

377

LNG carrier median 308 kg/nm (+22%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

14.9

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (+37%)

Average speed

14.0 kn

LNG carrier median 13.5 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

126.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

33,634 t

CO₂ emitted

97,702 t

Distance sailed

89,333 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,370 h

265 days, 73% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 289 kg/nm · median 190 (+52%)

152Ranks 314 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 13.5 kn · median 14.4 (−6%)

11.2Faster than 30% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 5.32 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−25%)

5.06Ranks 68 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports10%
From the EU47%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,534 t

1.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AL AREESH
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

AL AREESH
LNG carrier median

13.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

AL AREESH
LNG carrier median

5.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	−1.8 kn	−13%	−23%	−97%	−58%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	−5%	−9%	−58%	−10%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	−4%	−3%	+6%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	−3%	−5%	−29%	−9%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+2.0 kn	+1%	+15%	−19%	+0%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.5 kn	+14%	+11%	−21%	+12%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Seapeak Maritime Limited	174	480	604	45	13.5	289	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	7,693	21,333	23,150	1,518	15.3	332	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	19,116	55,271	54,497	3,432	15.9	351	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	18,930	54,726	51,617	3,290	15.7	367	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	27,431	79,285	72,346	4,528	16.0	379	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	33,634	97,702	89,333	6,370	14.0	377	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	37,227	106,427	113,067	7,818	14.5	329	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Seapeak Maritime Limited	5.32	7.12	−25%	68 of 386	DNV	A+B
2023LNG / alt.	not published	12.7	9.10	+39%	275 of 355	DNV	A+B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	14.0	10.4	+35%	283 of 379	DNV	A+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	13.5	10.5	+29%	210 of 289	DNV	A+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	14.9	10.7	+39%	218 of 267	DNV	A+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	14.9	10.9	+37%	197 of 248	DNV	A+C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	13.3	10.9	+22%	144 of 197	DNV	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.