Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

THOR FUTURE

IMO: 9326146
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 34,352 t
Flag (estimated): Thailand
Port of registry: Bangkok
Technical efficiency: EIV 4.98 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 34,352 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

116

Bulk carrier median 86.1 kg/nm (+35%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.27 (+28%)

Average speed

10.8 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.8 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

30.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,072 t

CO₂ emitted

3,352 t

Distance sailed

9,223 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

854 h

36 days, 10% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 3,548 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 116 kg/nm · median 86.1 (+35%)

63.6Ranks 3,097 of 3,548, lowest first125

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 10.8 (+0%)

8.8Faster than 50% of bulk carrier ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.27 (+28%)

4.85Ranks 2,498 of 3,548, lowest first17.4

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU13%
Into the EU70%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

73 t

2.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

THOR FUTURE
Bulk carrier median

80.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’192019’232023

Average speed, kn

THOR FUTURE
Bulk carrier median

10.010.310.510.811.0

’192019’232023

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

THOR FUTURE
Bulk carrier median

7.08.09.010.011.0

’192019’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2019→2023	+0.8 kn	+39%	+50%	−62%	+46%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 39%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023	not published	1,072	3,352	9,223	854	10.8	116	10.6	–
2019	not published	2,030	6,347	24,239	2,428	10.0	83.8	7.27	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023	not published	10.6	8.27	+28%	2,498 of 3,548	Bureau Veritas	A+B
2019	not published	7.27	8.38	−13%	1,216 of 3,360	Bureau Veritas	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.