Navalyze · Container · Ship

WEC FRANS HALS

IMO: 9326964
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,713 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 25.52 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: NCL SVELGEN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,201 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

80.7

Container median 174 kg/nm (−54%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

60.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+219%)

Average speed

12.5 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (−9%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,643 t

CO₂ emitted

14,563 t

Distance sailed

57,512 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,606 h

192 days, 53% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 79.8 kg/nm · median 177 (−55%)

78.8Ranks 238 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 13.3 (−16%)

9.1Faster than 24% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 44.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+170%)

7.22Ranks 1,947 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports89%
From the EU0%
Into the EU1%
At berth in the EU10%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,449 t

10.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

WEC FRANS HALS
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

WEC FRANS HALS
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.016.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

WEC FRANS HALS
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	+5%	−0%	−7%	−4%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.6 kn	−3%	+2%	+9%	+18%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.5 kn	+3%	−16%	−10%	−22%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.3 kn	−4%	−12%	−9%	+1%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.5 kn	+5%	+24%	+12%	−18%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	−6%	−5%	+16%	+0%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	4,933	15,550	61,856	5,509	11.2	79.8	44.0	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	5,027	15,828	66,421	5,575	11.9	75.7	45.7	–
2023	not published	4,729	14,899	60,761	5,387	11.3	77.8	38.7	–
2022	not published	5,099	15,922	67,365	4,893	13.8	75.7	49.8	–
2021	not published	5,866	18,304	74,254	4,933	15.1	79.0	49.4	–
2020	not published	5,026	15,774	66,575	5,268	12.6	75.5	60.5	–
2019	not published	4,643	14,563	57,512	4,606	12.5	80.7	60.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	44.0	16.3	+170%	1,947 of 2,208	DNV	C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	45.7	17.5	+161%	1,696 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023	not published	38.7	19.4	+99%	1,521 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	49.8	19.1	+160%	1,608 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	49.4	17.9	+176%	1,598 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	60.5	17.6	+244%	1,693 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	60.3	18.9	+219%	1,657 of 1,788	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.