Navalyze · Container · Ship

CT DANIEL

IMO: 9326988
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,223 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 25.45 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: DANIEL

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Contarga Ltd.

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,844 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

70.8

Container median 178 kg/nm (−60%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

38.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (+100%)

Average speed

9.4 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (−31%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,159 t

CO₂ emitted

9,970 t

Distance sailed

44,617 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,746 h

198 days, 54% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 93.8 kg/nm · median 177 (−47%)

78.8Ranks 455 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 9.4 kn · median 13.3 (−29%)

9.1Faster than 12% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 56.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+246%)

7.22Ranks 2,087 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports60%
From the EU13%
Into the EU17%
At berth in the EU10%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

948 t

9.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CT DANIEL
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CT DANIEL
Container median

2.55.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CT DANIEL
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.3 kn	+18%	+3%	−65%	+20%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	+10%	+12%	−23%	+34%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.2 kn	+2%	+14%	+26%	−8%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.9 kn	−3%	−31%	−30%	−17%	3.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.1 kn	−12%	+5%	+124%	−12%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+6.5 kn	−12%	+111%	+89%	−28%	6.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.9 kn	+11%	−7%	−59%	+20%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Contarga Ltd.	1,401	4,399	14,946	1,583	9.4	93.8	56.4	–
2024	Contarga Ltd.	3,438	10,740	43,207	4,028	10.7	79.6	47.1	–
2023	not published	4,062	12,685	56,241	5,323	10.6	72.2	35.3	–
2022	not published	3,159	9,970	44,617	4,746	9.4	70.8	38.2	–
2021	not published	4,684	15,013	64,056	4,819	13.3	73.1	46.0	–
2020	not published	2,360	7,521	28,534	2,552	11.2	82.7	52.2	–
2019	not published	1,422	4,449	15,111	3,247	4.7	94.1	72.0	–
2018	not published	3,102	9,702	36,745	6,604	5.6	84.4	60.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Contarga Ltd.	56.4	16.3	+246%	2,087 of 2,208	EnvService	A
2024	Contarga Ltd.	47.1	17.5	+169%	1,717 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	35.3	19.4	+82%	1,458 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	38.2	19.1	+100%	1,455 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	46.0	17.9	+157%	1,549 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	52.2	17.6	+197%	1,616 of 1,797	DNV	A+C
2019	not published	72.0	18.9	+282%	1,718 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	60.0	20.2	+197%	1,575 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.