Navalyze · Container · Ship

HYUNDAI FORWARD

IMO: 9330707
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 33,358 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EIV 25.34 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 32,745 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

165

Container median 182 kg/nm (−10%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−23%)

Average speed

15.1 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

59.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,065 t

CO₂ emitted

34,499 t

Distance sailed

67,278 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,464 h

186 days, 51% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,788 container ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 160 kg/nm · median 174 (−8%)

82.1Ranks 833 of 1,788, lowest first309

Average speedThis ship 13.7 kn · median 13.7 (+0%)

8.6Faster than 49% of container ships16.5

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 18.9 (−21%)

7.86Ranks 654 of 1,788, lowest first55.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU45%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

355 t

1.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HYUNDAI FORWARD
Container median

160.0170.0180.0190.0

’182018’192019

Average speed, kn

HYUNDAI FORWARD
Container median

13.514.014.515.015.5

’182018’192019

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HYUNDAI FORWARD
Container median

14.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2018→2019	−1.4 kn	−3%	−12%	−48%	−4%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2019	not published	5,634	17,566	35,201	2,570	13.7	160	15.0	–
2018	not published	11,065	34,499	67,278	4,464	15.1	165	15.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2019	not published	15.0	18.9	−21%	654 of 1,788	Korean Register	C
2018	not published	15.7	20.2	−23%	588 of 1,705	Korean Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.