Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

LILA EVIA

IMO
9330771
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
12,694 t
Flag (estimated)
Liberia
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EEXI 7.78 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
MID FALCON, STRINDA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MOWINCKEL CHEMICAL TANKERS AS

?
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 17,394 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
75.0
Chemical tanker median 85.7 kg/nm (−12%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
13.5
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.2 (−16%)
Average speed
11.7 kn
Chemical tanker median 11.4 kn (+3%)
Fuel per day at sea
21.0 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,701 t
CO₂ emitted
5,326 t
Distance sailed
22,663 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,940 h
81 days, 22% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 71.3 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−11%)
52.8Ranks 527 of 1,460, lowest first111
Average speedThis ship 8.4 kn · median 11.1 (−24%)
8.8Faster than 8% of chemical tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+18%)
7.93Ranks 860 of 1,460, lowest first40.2
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports12%
  • From the EU67%
  • Into the EU10%
  • At berth in the EU11%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
561 t
10.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • LILA EVIA
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • LILA EVIA
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • LILA EVIA
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−2.6 kn+14%−12%+118%+7%2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+0.6 kn−36%−33%+144%−31%0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 36%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−2.3 kn+35%+10%−56%+41%2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 35%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+0.5 kn−3%+1%+13%+0%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021+0.5 kn−1%+4%−40%+25%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−1.5 kn−7%−18%+12%−17%1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+1.9 kn−4%+12%+104%−15%1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025part-yearMOWINCKEL CHEMICAL TANKERS AS5111,5976,6641,1635.776.740.2–
2025MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd2,5678,09036,0074,2718.471.317.775%
2024MOWINCKEL CHEMICAL TANKERS AS1,0303,25716,5051,50511.062.416.6–
2023not published6612,0976,75765210.497.823.9–
2022not published1,1073,50715,3171,20212.772.317.0–
2021not published1,0093,19813,5461,10912.274.516.9–
2020not published1,7015,32622,6631,94011.775.013.5–
2019not published1,6335,14020,2011,53413.280.916.2–
2018not published8322,6019,91187711.384.019.2–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025part-yearMOWINCKEL CHEMICAL TANKERS AS––––DNVB+C
2025MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd17.715.0+18%860 of 1,460Lloyd's RegisterA+C
2024MOWINCKEL CHEMICAL TANKERS AS16.616.7−1%631 of 1,274DNVA+C
2023not published23.916.2+48%904 of 1,314ClassNKA
2022not published17.016.1+6%751 of 1,409ClassNKA
2021not published16.916.7+1%692 of 1,343ClassNKA
2020not published13.516.2−16%447 of 1,312ClassNKA
2019not published16.217.3−6%587 of 1,321ClassNKA
2018not published19.217.1+12%761 of 1,294ABSC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.