Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd
Ships25
CO₂ emitted121 kt−25.1%
Fuel per mile66 kg/nm
Average speed10.3 kn
CO₂ at berth6.7%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentChemical tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0

  • MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd13.2 (−12%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd2513.2−12%6610.31,8936.7%–
Segment median 15.00%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
MTM Ship Management Pte LtdLloyd's Register (25)88%0%88%0%

MTM Ship Management Pte Ltd: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
MTM VANCOUVER9867607Chemical tanker99.6 g CO₂/t·nm39.2+154%9.01,548 t€51k
MTM HOUSTON9505924Chemical tanker15.5 g CO₂/t·nm15.2+2%11.94,415 t€137k
PACIFIC STAR9363481Chemical tanker20.6 g CO₂/t·nm21.4−4%10.43,117 t€85k
MTM SAVANNAH9726750Chemical tanker13.2 g CO₂/t·nm15.2−13%10.32,166 t€76k
MTM KOBE9776456Chemical tanker13.2 g CO₂/t·nm15.2−14%10.53,844 t€149k
LILA EVIA9330771Chemical tanker17.7 g CO₂/t·nm21.4−17%8.48,090 t€233k
MTM SINGAPORE9477529Chemical tanker12.5 g CO₂/t·nm15.2−18%11.02,836 t€97k
MTM SHANGHAI9345908Chemical tanker12.0 g CO₂/t·nm15.2−21%10.23,975 t€124k
MTM NEW ORLEANS9749398Chemical tanker8.9 g CO₂/t·nm11.5−22%11.05,564 t€159k
MTM ROTTERDAM9477567Chemical tanker11.3 g CO₂/t·nm15.2−26%9.04,530 t€168k
INDIGO RAY9716016Chemical tanker15.7 g CO₂/t·nm21.4−26%11.38,842 t€274k
MTM HAMBURG9379844Chemical tanker10.7 g CO₂/t·nm15.2−30%11.41,359 t€36k
MTM TORTOLA9742065Chemical tanker14.1 g CO₂/t·nm21.4−34%10.72,923 t€86k
MTM AMSTERDAM9776444Chemical tanker9.6 g CO₂/t·nm15.2−37%11.13,222 t€99k

30 of 25 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.