Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM TARPON

IMO
9331012
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
34,822 t
Flag (estimated)
Malta
Port of registry
Valetta
Technical efficiency
EIV 21.81 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 44,264 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
200
Container median 174 kg/nm (+15%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
14.1
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−25%)
Average speed
14.6 kn
Container median 13.7 kn (+7%)
Fuel per day at sea
70.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
16,446 t
CO₂ emitted
51,421 t
Distance sailed
82,272 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,629 h
235 days, 64% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2020

Set against all 1,797 container ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 138 kg/nm · median 172 (−20%)
80.4Ranks 704 of 1,797, lowest first315
Average speedThis ship 12.5 kn · median 14.0 (−11%)
10.4Faster than 30% of container ships16.6
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.6 (−29%)
7.14Ranks 536 of 1,797, lowest first52.3
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports6%
  • From the EU45%
  • Into the EU46%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
16,084 t
98% of all fuel; 2% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
1,152 t
2.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • CMA CGM TARPON
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • CMA CGM TARPON
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • CMA CGM TARPON
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2019→2020−2.1 kn−31%−41%−88%−12%2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 31%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019−0.8 kn−0%−5%+8%−12%0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2020not published1,3614,2919,89079012.513812.5100%
2019not published16,44651,42182,2725,62914.620014.198%
2018not published15,23847,57476,1954,95815.420016.0–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2020not published12.517.6−29%536 of 1,797ABSC
2019not published14.118.9−25%578 of 1,788ABSC
2018not published16.020.2−21%602 of 1,705ABSC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.