Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

SERI BALHAF

IMO
9331660
Type
LNG carrier
Flag (estimated)
Malaysia
Port of registry
Port Kelang
Technical efficiency
EIV 6.39 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)
?

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
237
LNG carrier median 257 kg/nm (−8%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
6.98
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.5 (−33%)
Average speed
16.7 kn
LNG carrier median 14.6 kn (+14%)
Fuel per day at sea
94.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
4,190 t
CO₂ emitted
11,556 t
Distance sailed
17,697 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,059 h
44 days, 12% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2022

Set against all 379 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 219 kg/nm · median 252 (−13%)
174Ranks 135 of 379, lowest first380
Average speedThis ship 15.3 kn · median 14.1 (+9%)
10.2Faster than 77% of LNG carrier ships15.9
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 10.9 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 10.4 (+5%)
5.96Ranks 214 of 379, lowest first26.4
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU37%
  • Into the EU62%
  • At berth in the EU1%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
74 t
0.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • SERI BALHAF
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • SERI BALHAF
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • SERI BALHAF
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2021→2022−1.4 kn−7%−15%−17%+56%1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021−0.2 kn+9%+8%+59%−17%Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+0.8 kn+1%+6%−84%+47%0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+1.0 kn+7%+14%+321%–1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2022LNG / alt.not published3,2169,02814,66795815.3219––
2021LNG / alt.not published4,19011,55617,6971,05916.7237––
2020LNG / alt.not published2,4146,65411,15866116.9216––
2019LNG / alt.not published14,71040,54468,7234,27316.1214––
2018LNG / alt.not published3,2608,99916,3161,08415.1200––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2022LNG / alt.not published10.910.4+5%214 of 379DNVA+C
2021LNG / alt.not published6.9810.5−33%64 of 289DNVA+C
2020LNG / alt.not published8.4210.7−21%66 of 267DNVA+C
2019LNG / alt.not published5.7110.9−47%15 of 248DNVA+C
2018LNG / alt.not published––––DNVA+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.