Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

CHRYSTAL ARCTIC

IMO: 9332640
Type: Oil tanker
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EIV 4.08 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: HAFNIA ARCTIC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: EXECUTIVE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

122.8 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

11.0 kn

Fuel per day at sea

32.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,095 t

CO₂ emitted

3,441 t

3,495 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

8,916 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

813 h

34 days, 9% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2022

Set against all 1,961 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 118.7 kg/nm · median 131.1 (−9%)

79.6Ranks 739 of 1,961, lowest first192.4

Average speedThis ship 10.3 kn · median 10.9 (−6%)

7.9Faster than 37% of oil tanker ships12.3

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.03 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.51 (+6%)

4.85Ranks 1,063 of 1,961, lowest first24.95

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU37%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU7%

61% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,098 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

7.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CHRYSTAL ARCTIC
Oil tanker median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

Average speed, kn

CHRYSTAL ARCTIC
Oil tanker median

8.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CHRYSTAL ARCTIC
Oil tanker median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2022→2024	+0.7 kn	+3%	+10%	−76%	–	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.7 kn	+14%	+36%	−15%	−6%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	−13%	−17%	+676%	+3%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	−75%	−72%	−68%	−75%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 75%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.7 kn	+306%	+207%	−58%	+294%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 306%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	EXECUTIVE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD	1,095	3,441	8,916	813	11.0	122.8	–	–
2022	not published	4,479	14,099	37,731	3,657	10.3	118.7	9.03	–
2021	not published	4,653	14,785	44,604	5,166	8.6	104.3	9.60	–
2020	not published	691	2,191	5,745	637	9.0	120.4	9.28	–
2019	not published	8,505	27,146	17,995	2,190	8.2	472.6	37.50	–
2018	not published	5,015	15,863	43,063	3,962	10.9	116.5	9.52	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	EXECUTIVE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	9.03	8.51	+6%	1,063 of 1,961	DNV	A
2021	not published	9.60	8.86	+8%	1,000 of 1,789	ABS	A
2020	not published	9.28	9.03	+3%	965 of 1,870	ABS	A
2019	not published	37.50	8.83	+325%	1,823 of 1,919	ABS	A
2018	not published	9.52	8.86	+7%	977 of 1,779	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.