Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- EXECUTIVE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTDyour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| EXECUTIVE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 22 |
| CO₂ emitted | 114 kt |
| Fuel per mile | 98 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 12.4 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 4.4% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Oil tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- EXECUTIVE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD5.2 (−36% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXECUTIVE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD | 10 | 5.2 | −36% | 97 | 13.1 | 2,350 | 4.9% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7
- EXECUTIVE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD11.2 (−33% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXECUTIVE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD | 5 | 11.2 | −33% | 86 | 11.4 | 1,649 | 5.1% | – |
| Segment median | 16.7 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- EXECUTIVE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD2.5 (−69% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXECUTIVE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD | 4 | 2.5 | −69% | 115 | 10.5 | 817 | 2.2% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 17.5
- EXECUTIVE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD12.3 (−30% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXECUTIVE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD | 1 | 12.3 | −30% | 162 | 17.9 | 368 | 0.0% | – |
| Segment median | 17.5 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
EXECUTIVE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHOLA VIRTUE | 9267601 | Bulk carrier | 21.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | +42% | 10.0 | 2,599 t | €41k |
| THE CHIEF | 9492361 | Oil tanker | 30.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | +22% | 8.7 | 7,133 t | €140k |
| THE JUDGE | 9755725 | Chemical tanker | 17.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | +8% | 11.2 | 9,190 t | €194k |
| ALPINE EAGLE | 9366275 | Chemical tanker | 11.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 12.0 | −7% | 11.0 | 3,343 t | €55k |
| THE BLACKSMITH | 9659660 | Oil tanker | 22.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | −10% | 11.5 | 6,403 t | €120k |
| MARLIN LOME | 9823572 | Oil tanker | 4.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.5 | −10% | 27.4 | 19,535 t | €311k |
| CMA CGM MERCANTOUR | 9969089 | Container | 12.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.5 | −15% | 17.9 | 3,327 t | €50k |
| KAMOME VICTORIA | 9584102 | Oil tanker | 5.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | −18% | 12.6 | 3,853 t | €59k |
| DAT VENUS | 9948293 | Chemical tanker | 6.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.6 | −30% | 12.2 | 2,620 t | €45k |
| MARLIN LAGOS | 9823584 | Oil tanker | 4.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | −35% | 10.7 | 9,628 t | €147k |
| CAPE PLEASURE | 9960124 | Bulk carrier | 2.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.9 | −48% | 10.7 | 6,400 t | €98k |
| CAROUGE | 9933080 | Bulk carrier | 2.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.9 | −58% | 13.0 | 226 t | €3k |
30 of 22 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.