Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

GALAXY I

IMO: 9333694
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Latvia
Port of registry: Riga
Technical efficiency: EIV 2.98 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super
Former names: GALAXY

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HT Shipmanagement OU

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

196

Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (+25%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

744

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 626 (+19%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

60.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (−76%)

Average speed

15.4 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

72.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,128 t

CO₂ emitted

51,548 t

Distance sailed

82,156 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,347 h

223 days, 61% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2022

Set against all 394 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 196 kg/nm · median 157 (+25%)

79.7Ranks 301 of 394, lowest first241

Average speedThis ship 15.4 kn · median 16.0 (−4%)

12.3Faster than 40% of ro-pax ships22.6

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 744 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 626 (+19%)

71.5Ranks 216 of 394, lowest first1,606

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 60.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−76%)

66.3Ranks 32 of 394, lowest first1,135

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports91%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4,686 t

9.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GALAXY I
Ro-pax median

140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GALAXY I
Ro-pax median

14.515.015.516.016.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

GALAXY I
Ro-pax median

50.0100150200250300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

GALAXY I
Ro-pax median

2505007501,0001,2501,500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2023→2024	–	–	–	–	–
2022→2023	–	–	–	–	–
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+9%	+9%	−30%	−46%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	+0%	+1%	−2%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	−4%	−5%	+5%	+195%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.6 kn	+2%	+6%	−3%	−0%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	HT Shipmanagement OU	1,251	4,011	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024	HT Shipmanagement OU	2,204	7,065	–	0	–	–	–	–
2023	not published	3,854	12,356	–	0	–	–	–	–
2022	not published	16,128	51,548	82,156	5,347	15.4	196	–	–
2021	not published	20,994	66,155	116,645	7,558	15.4	180	–	–
2020	not published	21,253	66,968	118,627	7,750	15.3	179	–	–
2019	not published	21,171	66,709	113,428	7,339	15.5	187	–	–
2018	not published	21,477	67,675	117,332	7,876	14.9	183	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	HT Shipmanagement OU	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	C
2024	HT Shipmanagement OU	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	C
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	C
2022	not published	744	626	+19%	216 of 394	60.5	253	−76%	Verifavia	A+C
2021	not published	1,370	815	+68%	292 of 377	69.4	226	−69%	Verifavia	A+C
2020	not published	1,476	751	+97%	286 of 387	75.3	217	−65%	Verifavia	A+C
2019	not published	500	569	−12%	180 of 394	62.5	223	−72%	Verifavia	A+C
2018	not published	501	729	−31%	151 of 361	64.6	184	−65%	Verifavia	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.