Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

EJNAN

IMO: 9334076
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EIV 12.36 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

343

LNG carrier median 252 kg/nm (+36%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

31.9

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.4 (+207%)

Average speed

16.5 kn

LNG carrier median 14.1 kn (+17%)

Fuel per day at sea

135.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

19,748 t

CO₂ emitted

57,721 t

Distance sailed

57,523 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,488 h

145 days, 40% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 341 kg/nm · median 231 (+48%)

167Ranks 298 of 355, lowest first359

Average speedThis ship 14.9 kn · median 14.2 (+5%)

10.7Faster than 68% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 13.5 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (+49%)

5.47Ranks 293 of 355, lowest first17.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU23%
Into the EU77%
At berth in the EU0%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

214 t

0.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EJNAN
LNG carrier median

200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

EJNAN
LNG carrier median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

EJNAN
LNG carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	−1.6 kn	−1%	−10%	−52%	−58%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.6 kn	−1%	+9%	+143%	+151%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	−9%	−10%	−9%	−30%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.2 kn	+6%	−1%	−56%	+34%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	+4%	+5%	−6%	−17%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023LNG / alt.	not published	9,440	27,441	27,692	1,856	14.9	341	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	19,748	57,721	57,523	3,488	16.5	343	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	8,252	24,161	23,680	1,588	14.9	349	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	9,950	28,292	25,948	1,726	15.0	383	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	21,227	61,170	58,906	3,645	16.2	360	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	21,586	62,883	62,452	3,903	16.0	346	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023LNG / alt.	not published	13.5	9.10	+49%	293 of 355	ClassNK	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	31.9	10.4	+207%	347 of 379	ClassNK	B+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	12.7	10.5	+21%	194 of 289	ClassNK	B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	18.0	10.7	+68%	238 of 267	ClassNK	B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	13.5	10.9	+24%	176 of 248	ClassNK	B+C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	16.3	10.9	+50%	172 of 197	ClassNK	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.